e. all of the above
DAH ashdjcfsrhndukf
That's a loving stupid ideology to take and you know it. The only reason you even entertain this lunatic's ideas is because you desperately uphold your reputation of being kind and neutral when really all you're doing is mulling over the arguments of a man who has no desire to actually convince anyone of anything, but instead wants to seem edgy and profound by disagreeing with everything.
The only reason I was upholding Taboo's 'argument' (Though I was really holding up a general philosophy more than anything.) was because he held a valid point and you shot it down quickly because you thought that it was sadistic and because of his own individual actions. I'm not trying to make an issue or convince you of anything, just presenting it in a way that maybe you'll understand better or accept more from a 3rd party.
My own beliefs aside, the point of view, at least that I'm talking about, is that what happens with one's immediate experiences can be more important than worldly happenings. And, although they both have the same impact, a more lasting effect and a stronger change can be made locally better than internationally (more often than not). This isn't unreasonable, since most humans can only measure by what is in front of them. It also isn't unreasonable to act more so with local interests than worldly interests. Most people do, anyway, whether they realize it or not. A person is usually more prone to act in interest of their own home than the land of somebody's across the world that they never met.
And although it would have probably been more consistent with the ideal had Taboo just left this thread be, at the same time you shouldn't dismiss the entire thought because he happens to have a derivative of it. Disagree with it, fine, but try to understand it as well. We learn better that way, I think. It helps develop our own views if we know those around us...
