Author Topic: Tesseracts and beyond  (Read 2476 times)

The fourth isn't time you twat, it's so much more complicated than saying it's "Time"

but that's what it is, time.

the fourth dimension is where a third dimentional object is at a specific point in time.

but that's what it is, time.

the fourth dimension is where a third dimentional object is at a specific point in time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

there isn't really a unianimously accepted definition of the fourth dimension anyway. hell, we still barely understand time, gravity, and light themselves. or more specifically, we can only guess at how they interact.

there isn't really a unianimously accepted definition of the fourth dimension anyway. hell, we still barely understand time, gravity, and light themselves. or more specifically, we can only guess at how they interact.
niger

Post a picture of the same cube twice at different times. That is four dimensional lol. The error with the picture of the "hypercube" in the OP is that is assumes the fourth dimension is another of space.

Post a picture of the same cube twice at different times. That is four dimensional lol. The error with the picture of the "hypercube" in the OP is that is assumes the fourth dimension is another of space.
You're assuming its time.

You're assuming its time.
Only because it has always been time. Before we had crazy theories we had time and 3 dimensions of space. We didn't have hypercubes until after we had time, so logically the fourth dimension of space would not be the fourth dimension.

EDIT: But I suppose it doesn't really matter anyway because it is still four dimensional, whether or not they are the first four dimensions.

Understanding the 10th dimension
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkxieS-6WuA
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySBaYMESb8o

(includes everything up to that as well)

Only because it has always been time. Before we had crazy theories we had time and 3 dimensions of space. We didn't have hypercubes until after we had time, so logically the fourth dimension of space would not be the fourth dimension.

EDIT: But I suppose it doesn't really matter anyway because it is still four dimensional, whether or not they are the first four dimensions.
Is it not logical to say its not time and that is just another form of space? I mean 1 Dimension = line 2 dimensional = cubes and stuff 3 dimensional = 3D; Getting the pattern here?

In this instance time is a form of space, an object at a certain point of time will differ somehow from the same object in another point of time.

if you watch Cube, you'll know everything about tesseracts.

Could you possibly link this? I can't find any videos or films titled Cube that concern tesseracts.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 11:47:48 AM by Awdax »

In this instance time is a form of space, an object at a certain point of time will differ somehow from the same object in another point of time.

Could you possibly link this? I can't find any videos or films titled Cube that concern tesseracts.

It's a movie, a horror movie, but it explains tesseracts pretty well.

1997 film or 1969 film?


TesseracT is a good band