Author Topic: 5 Reasons why GTA San Andreas is better than GTA IV  (Read 1926 times)

All GTA games are good in their own way.
Not when you have to refuel your loving car/plan/tank/motorcycle every time the fuel runs out.

Yea GTA:V is going to be in a huge area and yet you have to have cash just to explore the whole damn place in a vehicle!?

In terms of technology, GTA IV was way beyond GTA SA. They had to make compromises because they focused on bringing GTA to the next generation. At least that's my assumption.

I loved the theme of GTA IV. The serbian immigrant and the russian mafia and all. I loved that. way more than the gangs of SA.

Not when you have to refuel your loving car/plan/tank/motorcycle every time the fuel runs out.

Yea GTA:V is going to be in a huge area and yet you have to have cash just to explore the whole damn place in a vehicle!?
realism, my friend.


realism.

>Never played GTA: SA
>Constantly played GTA: VC
>Has no loving idea what the big deal is with GTA: SA

I never understand why people obsess about it so much. I didn't even hear about SA until after I had stopped playing VC, and I don't hear about it more than when someone might come out saying it was great. From my perspective, SA is an obscure game with a bunch of fanboys. I'm being totally serious, I only even knew it existed after the fact, and it really feels to me like it's... nothing...
Why are you so consistently stupid? San Andreas was the top selling game on the PS2 and one of the best selling games on any platform. On top of that there was the Hot Coffee mod which received a lot of media attention at the time. It is by no means an obscure game.

Why are you so consistently stupid? San Andreas was the top selling game on the PS2 and one of the best selling games on any platform. On top of that there was the Hot Coffee mod which received a lot of media attention at the time. It is by no means an obscure game.

I tried to get a PS2, then a PS3, but that never came along. I literally never heard of it outside of Hot Coffee, which of course I knew about, but it seemed to only give me the impression of a random game having problems as they usually did back then.

And as I loving said, my perspective, how I see it, how it came to me. I didn't say it was for everyone, it was my personal exposure.

And as I loving said, my perspective, how I see it, how it came to me. I didn't say it was for everyone, it was my personal exposure.
SA is an obscure game with a bunch of fanboys.

6.GTA San Andreas has no fuel for vehicles and GTA V does.
I'd love to know where this info came from.



Nice cutting up a sentence and putting it out of context.

From my perspective, SA is an obscure game with a bunch of fanboys.

Gta5 will probably just use steam like la noire

Wait
Rockstar released LA Noire for PC?

Nice cutting up a sentence and putting it out of context.

thanks

i'm practicing for my debate next week :]

You're four years late for critiquing it.

too bad gta iv didn't come out four years ago

too bad gta iv didn't come out four years ago
Fine, 3.88 years if you want to be a smart ass about it.

Fine, 3.88 years if you want to be a smart ass about it.

oh damn, i'm pretty stupid, i thought it was still 2010, my bad

you guys complain over the silliest things
gfwl isn't all that bad