Poll

Mango?

Mango
10 (32.3%)
Mango
0 (0%)
Mango
4 (12.9%)
Mango
8 (25.8%)
Mango
3 (9.7%)
Mango
4 (12.9%)
Mango
1 (3.2%)
Mango
1 (3.2%)

Total Members Voted: 31

Author Topic: Zombies in the Bluzone** [[CLOSING]]  (Read 583497 times)

He even taunted me after the end of the logs posted on page 104.

Why did they rape anyway?

... So is there a situation where it'd be okay to role play raping? Because I'm really not seeing why you couldn't of just written a list of what's not okay. I mean, it's not that you just suddenly added new rules without informing people, or making the rules public, it's that you banned somebody for something they had no idea was wrong.


Why did they rape anyway?
Why or who?
They raped Audax.

... So is there a situation where it'd be okay to role play raping? Because I'm really not seeing why you couldn't of just written a list of what's not okay. I mean, it's not that you just suddenly added new rules without informing people, or making the rules public, it's that you banned somebody for something they had no idea was wrong.
I wish I wasn't so tired and I didn't have to go. I want to argue this so much.

I find this so hot, yet I feel EXTREMELY bad for liking it.

Don't quote me please.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2012, 04:27:33 AM by LawtyLawt »


I think there's this thing called "perfection" and "situations".

You can't predict every situation, and have to adapt.
Jookia is totally correct about this. Banning Hydralisk for this is unjust simply because there is literally no possible way Hydralisk could've known you found this distasteful.

I find this so hot, yet I feel EXTREMELY bad for liking it.

You divulged a bit too much there.



I agree that Hydralisk's ban was a bit unjust seeing as he couldn't have possibly known because murder and rape and stuff are similar.

Though he shouldn't have antagonized Lugnut and THAT is worth a ban.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2012, 04:30:55 AM by Electrk »


I mean, it's not that you just suddenly added new rules without informing people, or making the rules public, it's that you banned somebody for something they had no idea was wrong.
Jookia is totally correct about this. Banning Hydralisk for this is unjust simply because there is literally no possible way Hydralisk could've known you found this distasteful.
I'm aware it wasn't apparent in the rules
...
which is why the ban is temporary and not permanent.

It's really the only rape that I'm uncomfortable with.
I mean, I've role-played defecating- however as a joke -and murder, Self Delete and suffering is okay with me.
All of them are heavy subjects, and I've done all of them myself in the server.

This is, again, just a personal thing.

I don't want to sound like a douche but I think you let your bias make the decision to ban.

It's really the only rape that I'm uncomfortable with.
I mean, I've role-played defecating- however as a joke -and murder, Self Delete and suffering is okay with me.
All of them are heavy subjects, and I've done all of them myself in the server.

This is, again, just a personal thing.
>Defecating
>Kniaz, you EVIL bastard

It's really the only rape that I'm uncomfortable with.
I mean, I've role-played defecating- however as a joke -and murder, Self Delete and suffering is okay with me.
All of them are heavy subjects, and I've done all of them myself in the server.

This is, again, just a personal thing.
Why would you host such a dark and depressing roleplay if you have issues with dark topics?

It's like someone with severe arachnophobia hosting a Nightmare Simulator.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2012, 04:38:30 AM by Kaphonaits »

To be clear, I'm not saying he should be unbanned because he still disrespected Lugnut.
I'm just saying it was unfair of you to ban him for the rape thing.

To be clear, I'm not saying he should be unbanned because he still disrespected Lugnut.
I'm just saying it was unfair of you to ban him for the rape thing.
This.