BlockoNet Teaser

[Fluff-is-back]

I don't think charging for names is a good idea. I would suggest simply approving requests.

[Ad Bot]

[Pentium]

awesomium looks cool but pointless for this project.

You could look at how the HTML/CSS parser is done, and then rewrite it in TorqueScript. I know, it's a lot of work, but you don't need to support every single feature that has ever existed, just make pages somewhat viewable.

[DontCare4Free]

You could look at how the HTML/CSS parser is done, and then rewrite it in TorqueScript. I know, it's a lot of work, but you don't need to support every single feature that has ever existed, just make pages somewhat viewable.

You's use a proxy for that.

[Conan]

Would you add an option to change our default ID site to some other name? As in, still have one site only but not necessarily ID-named

[Pentium]

You's use a proxy for that.

There's a proxy which converts HTML into BBCode?

[DontCare4Free]

There's a proxy which converts HTML into BBCode?

It's converted from bbcode to torqueml on the server. You should be able to translate html to torqueml, at least as long as you don't preserve CSS.

[Pentium]

It's converted from bbcode to torqueml on the server. You should be able to translate html to torqueml, at least as long as you don't preserve CSS.

Wait, so everything is converted on the server? Sorry, but that sounds awfully inefficient. Wouldn't it be better to let the client's browser do the conversion, or are there limitations in Torque which makes this impossible?

[Brian Smithers]

Would you add an option to change our default ID site to some other name? As in, still have one site only but not necessarily ID-named

No...
Thats what you pay for.

[DontCare4Free]

Wait, so everything is converted on the server? Sorry, but that sounds awfully inefficient. Wouldn't it be better to let the client's browser do the conversion, or are there limitations in Torque which makes this impossible?

Torque is awfully slow and lacks a ton of features (lists, regexps, etc). It's much more efficient to just do the compilation once (on save).

[Scout31]

Would you add an option to change our default ID site to some other name? As in, still have one site only but not necessarily ID-named

I've considered this myself. Possibly.

[Fluff-is-back]

I think the best way to sort out domains for this would be for the site creator to request a preferred name, and an administrator can decide whether it's appropriate/already taken

[Derroith]

Am I the only one who finds this useless?

Honestly, why on earth do we need like a custom made Internet? What use does it have?

[mp7964]

Are you, by any chance, creating some sort of language for this? Similar to HTML or PHP?

[Brian Smithers]

Am I the only one who finds this useless?

Honestly, why on earth do we need like a custom made Internet? What use does it have?

>Ingame free websites
>Payed inbrowser websites that cost money to have a custom domain, may have hundreds over thousands of viewers making it a ton slower

Are you, by any chance, creating some sort of language for this? Similar to HTML or PHP?

We are using a basic BBC.

[Scout31]

PHP and HTML aren't comparable, considering that all pages are HTML.