■ The Photography Megathread ■

[Jokey365]

I continue to misread the topic title as "research Megathread"

[Ad Bot]

[xXBeibsFan119Xx]

Been doing some cooking recently. Have a look at my delicious cut up oranges:


Some oranges I cut. by 166291, on Flickr

[Tammy]

Been doing some cooking recently. Have a look at my delicious cut up oranges:

-snip-

Did you mean to take that at ISO 200? it looks kind of noisy.

It was pretty overcast today so the sunlight was softer than I would like, but I still got a few pictures with sharing.


Whitewater in the Cbrown town by Tawm2013, on Flickr


Spillway Tower by Tawm2013, on Flickr


Locked Bench by Tawm2013, on Flickr


Lampposts by Tawm2013, on Flickr


Bird With Worm by Tawm2013, on Flickr

[Night Fox]

did you not notice the post, or didn't see anything wrong with them?

[Böltster]

none of your photos have that artsy look that good photographers have, tammy

they look look like regular photos of stuff

[Extrude]

Absolutely horrid. It's a grainy as hell iPhone picture of oranges.

[Kniaz]

Murp.

EOS 10D.

[Kniaz]

Also,

I use a Nikon D80.

NIKON SCUM.

[Tetris]

Okay seriously what is the difference between Nikon and Canon

Is there any quality variances?

[Tammy]

did you not notice the post, or didn't see anything wrong with them?

First one looks a tad underexposed.

Second one looks fine I think.

Both first and second them look a little grainy, do you remember what film you used?

I think the third one is actually lens flare. Or it could be overexposure. If it's a long shutter, it's for sure overexposed.

none of your photos have that artsy look that good photographers have, tammy

they look look like regular photos of stuff

Is this what you mean by "artsy":


If so, mine don't look like that because I actually have common sense when it comes to post processing, and I don't like to use cheap tricks to make my photos look artsy.

Also,

NIKON SCUM.

It's just my dad's old camera. My old point and shoot was Canon.
But if I got a new DSLR, I would probably go with Nikon because that's what I'm used to.

Okay seriously what is the difference between Nikon and Canon

Is there any quality variances?

There both reputable camera makers in general, but I'm sure a quick Google search will bring up lots of debates over which is better.

[xXBeibsFan119Xx]

Absolutely horrid. It's a grainy as hell iPhone picture of oranges.

That's 100% natural grain there. I'm not a hipster, I just have the smallest sensor that Wikipedia has a chart for.

[Tammy]

That's 100% natural grain there. I'm not a hipster, I just have the smallest sensor that Wikipedia has a chart for.

You still might have gotten a little less grain by using a lower ISO (unless 200 is your native ISO). But yeah it's mostly your camera's fault. I'm still surprised because your camera seems really nice for a point and shoot.

[Kniaz]

But if I got a new DSLR, I would probably go with Nikon because that's what I'm used to.

Silly boy.

Also,

[Night Fox]

First one looks a tad underexposed.
Second one looks fine I think.
Both first and second them look a little grainy, do you remember what film you used?

I wouldn't be surprised about over or underexposure, I was just starting with it at the time
I don't remember what kind of film it was, but I'm sure it was Kodak, I just don't remember what all numbers were involved
and the third one is probably lens flare and a long exposure. because that's a flaslight

[Bahamut]

notice: title