whait wat
In BO1 you had a flashback to WW2.So in BO2 you may have a flashback to BO1
Mainly because consoles suck.
Wait, what.The game looked a lot more detailed in the trailer so far. And this is coming from a guy who has heavily criticized the game's appearance considering MW3 was literally just a stuff ton of optimization to handle larger scenes (i.e. NYC) and a few bells n whistles in terms of lighting/shadows.The game is confirmed to use DX11 and the engine "update" (god knows which version of the same engine this is though. It's like how Portal 2 still operates on Source except it doesn't suck as much) looks like it added a bit more flare and lighting improvements.Oh, yeah definitely. As long as a game markets on consoles it will be held back in graphics because the Xbox 360 and PS3 are using heavily outdated hardware. VERY outdated hardware. Hell, the next Xbox is supposed to use a variant of an AMD HD 6000 series video chip, which is already pretty outdated (for reference, the current series of AMD GPUs is the HD 7000 series).
Call of Duty: Galactic Warfare.
Call of Duty: Dinosaur Laser Fighthang on that's actually really cool
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0CDcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinodday.com%2F&ei=dduhT_GmCOfM2gXs6tH8CA&usg=AFQjCNGC5JgzXDLxb4EWwLXI3wGaBRgsyg
The part with the horses is a flashback to the 1980s.
Doesnt matter. BF3 and Crysis look forgettons better than BO2 even on the console.My above statement.
At least that makes sense instead of random horse chase when there are mechs and stuff.
"SADDLE THE HORSES."
