[Suggestion]-Brick Groups

[¥ola]

I have noticed recently that trying to activate many bricks at once causes an error on some server's with low schedules, and so I thought up this idea:

Brick Groups:

• Can activate a whole group with one event
• Naming of groups
• Makes events a little bit easier

An idea of the GUI:


EDIT: Fixed

[Ad Bot]

[Treynolds416]

That's a really good idea
It's effectively a second name

[Katadeus]

I already posted this idea, but that gui idea looks great.
Anyway, since other people tend to get much more success with their suggestions, I support this!
However, could you include multiple brick group arguments, separated by commas?

[zmaster]

So basically you event one brick and all the bricks with the same group name are assigned the events?

[¥ola]

I already posted this idea, but that gui idea looks great.
Anyway, since other people tend to get much more success with their suggestions, I support this!
However, could you include multiple brick group arguments, separated by commas?

I love the multiple group idea, I would prefer the use of a semicolon though

So basically you event one brick and all the bricks with the same group name are assigned the events?
Yep

[Tic-toc26]

good idea
also if badspot is ever going to update the brick gui i had some simeple ideas
(note that the pic edit was a rush)
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=191592.0

[otto-san]

awesome idea c:

[Tic-toc26]

awesome idea c:

him me or both? lol

[Katadeus]

I love the multiple group idea, I would prefer the use of a semicolon though

Ooh, that might be cool.

Also, I'm not sure if zmaster and you are talking about the same thing; he's talking about having the events transferred to all of that group of brick, and you're talking about something like onactivate-brickgroup[Harold]-firerelay.
Right?

[Tic-toc26]

Ooh, that might be cool.

Also, I'm not sure if zmaster and you are talking about the same thing; he's talking about having the events transferred to all of that group of brick, and you're talking about something like onactivate-brickgroup[Harold]-firerelay.
Right?

i was saying if anyone was going to do this i thought it would be cool to add my ideas to it
EX: wepon up/down for wepon positions

[elm]

I dont get it, its the same thing as the brick having a second name. Someone explain to me this idea a little better.

[Treynolds416]

I dont get it, its the same thing as the brick having a second name. Someone explain to me this idea a little better.

That's a really good idea
It's effectively a second name

So, yes, but it doesn't matter what you call it because it's brilliant

[Katadeus]

i was saying if anyone was going to do this i thought it would be cool to add my ideas to it
EX: wepon up/down for wepon positions

I wasn't talking to you

Also, elm, a brick can only have one name. Giving it more makes it easy to do all sorts of stuff. Say you have a screen made of bricks. You can use brickgroup names to target multiple bricks with an event at the same time; if you want to, the entire screen.

[Treynolds416]

Also, elm, a brick can only have one name. Giving it more makes it easy to do all sorts of stuff. Say you have a screen made of bricks. You can use brickgroup names to target multiple bricks with an event at the same time; if you want to, the entire screen.

Re-read his post, that's not what he was asking

[Katadeus]

Re-read his post, that's not what he was asking

I don't quite see
Is it that I didn't explain that it wasn't actually a name?
It acts exactly like a name, as you said.