I don't believe in Evolution. I accept it as a valid scientific theory, and possibly a law. The scientific definition for "Theory" does not imply uncertainty. "Believe", however, does. Intelligent Design is simply the Bible's creation myth being attempted indoctrinated into society. Intelligent Design is no more valid then all the other hundreds of religious creation myths.
There is immense proof towards Evolution as a theory, and now a law. To deny it has enough proof is nothing short of ignorance.
To believe in something just means you think of it as true. The word "belief" doesn't only apply to things that may or may not be true. Believe doesn't imply uncertainty, it implies the opposite, belief says that you have confidence in somethings truth.
I have never found any "evidence" of evolution that is good enough to prove it as fact. There are somethings that might support it in a minor way, and there are other things that don't help the theory at all. Other than that, I have found nothing as far as proof goes.
That is macro evolution. They are one in the same: Evolutionary change above the species level. Some more proof:
I define micro-evolution differently. I define it as changing from one kind of animal to another, and that has never happened as far as people have observed. You can't look at something like that, happening at a small scale, and just assume it happens at a large scale too, that's not fact, that's a belief.
People follow scientific speak blindly, people do research and follow it intellectually.
People follow religion blindly, people do research and follow it intellectually.
Nobody should follow something blindly; Science is not exempt from this.
this
