Poll

BF3 or MW3

BF3 all the way
38 (56.7%)
Uh I guess BF3
5 (7.5%)
Frankly my dear I dont give a titt
16 (23.9%)
Uhhhh... ok MW3
1 (1.5%)
MW3 no doubt
7 (10.4%)

Total Members Voted: 67

Author Topic: Battlefield 3 or Modern Warfare 3  (Read 1900 times)

bad company 2 was pretty hot though
this is battlefield 3, not bc2.


bf3 sucks a lot less

bad company 2 was pretty hot though
no it wasn't


bf3 sucks a lot less
no it wasn't
For some reason I prefer it a lot more to BF3 probably because none of my friends play BF3 anymore... but then again they don't play BC2 anymore either.  Then again I don't have any friends.

/wrists

One is a fast paced arcade shooter while the other is a realistic strategy war simulator.

realistic strategy war simulator.


"Go to that place the enemies are at, shoot some dudes and stop them from taking it away!
Also, they might have a few tanks and more than two dudes, so take some other guys with you and work as a team, okay?"

I wouldn't call it realistic or strategic, it's just a game with more variety than MW3 and the gameplay calls for teamwork as opposed to running around a map smaller than the maps in the first Call of Duty with a sniper rifle which is effective at ranges 20x greater than you will ever see because of the map boundaries just so you can kill some dudes

BF3
Call of Duty is fast paced but you can also get fast paced shooting time in BF3.

Also BF3 has larger maps and support for more players.
BF3 has a larger arsenal.
BF3 also has tanks, helicopters, jets and ground transportation.
BF3 has a larger variation in maps and gamemodes.
BF3 has more attachments.
BF3 has more ranks which are actually useful (unlike prestige in MW3) (What I mean is that I would rather have fun getting to level 100 Connell then get to level 80 10 times and be bored by getting the same things over and over)

Comparing both of these games are handicapped.
Saying there are less kids on bf3 is handicapped.
Saying bf3 is realistic is handicapped.

MW3 is stuff because it takes no skill it's just a poking fight. BF3 is stuff because the squad system is forgeted voice chat is complete loving stuff and when I was playing it it was Shot gun FRaAG ROUNDS YO.

Oh but i'd be willing to play COD in a LAN scene it's a forget ton of fun when all the players are right next to each other.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2012, 09:39:19 AM by Soukuw »

2142 Titan Mode master race.

I want to try BF3 but Origin makes me want to shoot EA in the face

Comparing both of these games are handicapped.
Saying there are less kids on bf3 is handicapped.
Saying bf3 is realistic is handicapped.

MW3 is stuff because it takes no skill it's just a poking fight. BF3 is stuff because the squad system is forgeted voice chat is complete loving stuff and when I was playing it it was Shot gun FRaAG ROUNDS YO.

Oh but i'd be willing to play COD in a LAN scene it's a forget ton of fun when all the players are right next to each other.
Not all frag rounds for shotguns. Depends on what servers you are on. The most common I've seen are flechette.
Other than that, it's okay.

BF3 Tries to be COD with the new DLC's.

2142 Titan Mode master race.
1942 Tobruk and Vietnam Siege of Ke Sahn Master Race.

Both suck.  Play TF2/Blockland/Minecraft/Just Cause 2/Nitronic Rush/Resistance 3/Killzone 3/SSBB.
Those are %1,000,000,000,000 better than BF3 and MW3 in every way.

I'd rather have origin on my hard drive then MW3 in my steam list.

Tribes Ascend.

I win.