He really wasn't that bad. Oh well.
Actually, a rule of no single letter threads is there and scratch started a single letter thread
Read the bold text.
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=24809.0
But if that was so, how come no one who did it before him were not banned?
No stuff. I agree the ban was justified IF HE HAD DONE THE ACT AFTER THE RULE WAS SUBMITTED.However, that is not the case - scratch made the topic BEFORE the rule was implemented, yet he was still banned.
"but is not limited to"
thank you, blockhead.It doesn't say jack stuff about time!Scratch didn't break a rule because the rule didn't exist yet. Now, if he had posted the same topic today, he would have broken a rule BECAUSE THE RULE EXISTS.
what part of "is not limited to" do you not understand"here are the rules, but this might not be all of them"
ah. I understand now. is not limited too existed before scratch's post... I see.this point still stands though: