Author Topic: Earth 6.5- The Official "No nukes" version  (Read 170685 times)

It's grown exponentially.
Mine shouldn't be this high.
And his satellites are just fine.
It's funny because you're trying to judge someone's stuff when you got into immense debt by building a stuffty flying aircraft carrier (what's the point of launching PLANES out of the AIR?)

It's like a mobile air force base, you can hover over the battlefield and deploy planes from there.  Saves time and fuel (For the jets)

how does it save more fuel for the jets more than a normal aircraft carrier?

Because you can deploy the jets from over land, and they don't have to fly from the ocean.

It's like a mobile air force base, you can hover over the battlefield and deploy planes from there.  Saves time and fuel (For the jets)
if you do that your air aircraft carrier would be wasted

if you do that your air aircraft carrier would be wasted
I don't think he meant right over the battlefield
Like far enough away that it can't be harmed but close enough that it can deploy its Nimbus and fighters.




EDIT
Moved to new post.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2012, 07:12:16 PM by GEN.Fire Bird »


I don't think he meant right over the battlefield
Like far enough away that it can't be harmed but close enough that it can deploy its Nimbus and fighters.
Hence, the normal capabilities of a ship, but it costs way more money. Jus admit it's a useless piece of stuff.


Hence, the normal capabilities of a ship, but it costs way more money. Jus admit it's a useless piece of stuff.
How many cruise missiles can a normal ship carry?
This thing is a kilometer wide.
This thing could carry hundreds.

You're an idiot.
elaborate
How many cruise missiles can a normal ship carry?
This thing is a kilometer wide.
This thing could carry hundreds.
The 'thing' could also be easily shot down by a large number of aircraft/defenses