Author Topic: a cure for cancer - it was hiding in a swedish refridgerator  (Read 1505 times)

I tried to read most of it but I didnt read the entire article.
Is it safe to assume theres a 95% chance this wont end up working

To sum it up:  this guy might have a virus that helps kill cancer but its not properly tested, gives inconsistent results according to what information they have, and its sitting in a fridge ironically near cancer patients.

Everything I hate about modern society all rolled into one tiny ball of rage-inducing selfish bullstuff

tl;dr of the OP article:
This virus forces cancerous cells to kill themselves off. It's an adenovirus, which is totally safe - without some special engineering the human immune system would kill it before it even started working. With a million pounds of funding, it could be put through phase I and II clinical trials, leaving only phase III trials before it could be put into production.

The catch is that million pounds - despite being a tiny sum for the potential gains (he notes that Madonna makes more than that in ten days in the article) it's hard to acquire that funding. Since the results have been published in medical journals already, it can't be patented and as such no monopoly can be held over it so nobody wants to invest at this early stage. It's too shaky financially - if it doesn't work out in the trials, they get nothing, basically. And naturally nobody thinks "What if it does work" - it's all about the bottom line. Ironic that a pharmaceutical company wouldn't care about helping people.

Plus, this is the same type of cancer that killed Steve Jobs. How many times over could that be funded with a week's worth of Apple's profits? (Oh right, they couldn't patent it - Apple wouldn't touch that stuff)

Even if this doesn't work, it's a mistake that can be learned from. It's another step. Christ, if I had the money to fund it I'd be negotiating the transfer instead of typing this. Thousands of people do have that kind of money, though. Something like this shouldn't be having trouble just because of a lack of a loving patent. With the amount of people killed - and the resultant amount of people hurt - by cancer, this shouldn't even be a question of money.


iMad.

WHY DID EDD HAVE TO DIE BEFORE THIS HAPPENED
WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
SYHWUFDJSKD
okay i'm done

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/555181

forget, nobody told me that this can't be played again. (I want to see all the endings. :C)


forget, nobody told me that this can't be played again. (I want to see all the endings. :C)
that seems like an expansion of "everyday the same thing"

They haven't even tested it on anything. They're trying to raise money just to test it did you read.
He said he didn't. Colten never reads anything, don't you UNDERSTAND man.
No I did read it, I never said I didnt. Also I was saying that in response to the people going "Cure for cancer!!!"

And actually if you read it they mention multiple times them testing it in the lab, and on mice, even mentioning the tumor "melted away" because the OP article is written like a novel for whatever reason.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 04:54:07 PM by Pixel »

An effective cure was found years ago by Canada but it was put away because they didn't want to pay the high cost to produce it and get little money in return.

In this world you're left to die, unless you do things yourself.  :cookieMonster:

This is a forgeted up world, I swear.