Author Topic: BubbaGun- Attention Whore  (Read 129927 times)

i cant tell whos on whos side anymore
nor who is what gender
seriously what the forget is going on
qwepir are you a girl? pls say yes.

The majority of the world's occupants are religious.  According to mathematical fact, they're incorrect.

Mathematical facts that disprove what? And a guy doesn't have to be a priest to go limp-richard upon seeing Dusty's mangled man-parts.

No, that's pretty much all you said. And since that is probably the major crux of your argument, you're factually wrong. Unless you're more educated as a teenage girl than some of the leading minds in psychology and the human mind, who have studies this subject for longer than you've been alive, then I stand corrected.

But that's not really possible. Sorry, Doctor Stocking.

You underwent puberty while under the full blown effects of the SRY gene. You matured, your balls dropped, your testicles produced sperm. You were a definitive male specimen who radically spiked his hormone levels and had his genitals inverted with a knife. Tell me where I'm wrong.

i cant tell whos on whos side anymore
nor who is what gender
seriously what the forget is going on

dust12 and lolzor mcgee are male to female transloveuals

stocking and bubba are females

and red gaijin is a black man out for booty

I believe I said a whole lot more than that. Among which there was the part where the vast majority of the world thinks you're too disgusting to ever be appreciated, loved, or even forgeted.

hey man just because he chooses to be a loser doesn't mean you have to point it out.

 :cookieMonster:

and this topic has already been done before. she doesn't whore attention. you give it to her. i am khorde and i like boobs ok bye

Mathematical facts that disprove what? And a guy doesn't have to be a priest to go limp-richard upon seeing Dusty's mangled man-parts.
Here's a very basic way of putting it, without attacking each religion individually.
What cannot be proven is disproven.  My imaginary friend bill cannot be proven, but he's disproven due to the lack of proof stating his existence.

Also, almost all mainstream religions have loopholes which disprove their own beliefs entirely.  Galileo knew about the solar system before God did.  I'm curious to know how that's physically possible.

dust12 and lolzor mcgee are male to female transloveuals

stocking and bubba are females

and red gaijin is a black man out for booty
can i be a black man out for booty or can i be a female.

qwepir are you a girl? pls say yes.
I am and always will be a proud owner of a snake.

I am and always will be a proud owner of a snake.
wow omg no homo no homo pls.

You just keep repeating yourself. The same worthless, ignorant arguments over and over again. I'm sincerely confused as to whether you suffer from some sort of condition or if you're intent on making an ass of yourself with seemingly no positive gain. Regardless, I'm content in the fact that I actually am female, and your childish tantrum really means nothing in the grand scheme of things. There are people of more worth to society than you who are actually educated in psychology that are willing to back me up. That's all I need.

You're simply a terrible human being. You say that people will hate me, or think of me as disgusting, and I will be alone as a result of that. Whether or not that happens is irrelevant to me. But what I do know is that the behavior you've exhibited in this thread is more repulsive to any good person than I could ever be. I sincerely hope BubbaGum is thoroughly embarrassed by the groundless hostilities you've exhibited, and the ignorant mindset you possess, even more so if you really are doing it just to troll. I hope she reconsiders where she stands with you, because you just aren't a person worthy of any positive recognition.


Here's a very basic way of putting it, without attacking each religion individually.
What cannot be proven is disproven.  My imaginary friend bill cannot be proven, but he's disproven due to the lack of proof stating his existence.

Also, almost all mainstream religions have loopholes which disprove their own beliefs entirely.  Galileo knew about the solar system before God did.  I'm curious to know how that's physically possible.

You just keep repeating yourself. The same worthless, ignorant arguments over and over again. I'm sincerely confused as to whether you suffer from some sort of condition or if you're intent on making an ass of yourself with seemingly no positive gain. Regardless, I'm content in the fact that I actually am female,

You think you're a female, and as social progress is being distorted more and more into the socially-forced toleration of obscenity and hedonism, your surgeon was incline to tell you so.

For all intents and purposes, you'll never menstruate. As much as menstruation sucks, it's something that only females experience. You're also incapable of climax, you have no clitoris, you don't secrete a natural lubricant for love, you don't have ovulation cycles, you don't have female erogenous zones, you aren't sensitive to male pheromones, you don't have functioning mammary glands, your body has never been a host to eggs, your skeletal structure is masculine, your body can handle more mercury and alcohol, you don't have a g spot.

The only thing you have in common with females is that you can't get a boner.


Your lack of education in psychology is amusing, but I'm actually laughing about how little you know in regards to biology, or the surgery itself.

>nothing
I've defeated the mighty Stocking!

Your lack of education in psychology is amusing, but I'm actually laughing about how little you know in regards to biology, or the surgery itself.

Where exactly has psychology come up in my argument? It's neat how you spout off blind criticisms in a scattershot attempt to make a rebuttal, when you just keep talking in circles without once attempting to actually defend what you are. Then again, why fight a losing battle right?

>nothing
I've defeated the mighty Stocking!

It just wasn't important enough for me to remember I quoted it.

Here's a very basic way of putting it, without attacking each religion individually.
What cannot be proven is disproven.  My imaginary friend bill cannot be proven, but he's disproven due to the lack of proof stating his existence.

There's plenty of evidence in favor of religion, that's why there's still religion. Black holes and most of our astronomical science is sketchy and patched together (such as black holes and dark matter being literally 100% speculation to account for gravitational anomalies) since science is still torn between whether or not the main binding force of the universe is gravity or electromagnetism. Since electromagnetism is considerably more powerful and has a mountain of solid evidence to support it, it makes you wonder why the infinite-gravity wells imagined by scientists to patch together a sketchy theory are still mainstream.

Also, almost all mainstream religions have loopholes which disprove their own beliefs entirely.  Galileo knew about the solar system before God did.  I'm curious to know how that's physically possible.

The Bible never once says that the Earth is the center of the solar system. The clergy believed that the Earth had to be the center of the universe since they believed that Hell was at the center of the Earth, and logically, would make Hell the furthest thing from God in existence, since God himself existed outside of creation.

Where exactly has psychology come up in my argument? It's neat how you spout off blind criticisms in a scattershot attempt to make a rebuttal, when you just keep talking in circles without once attempting to actually defend what you are. Then again, why fight a losing battle right?
Exactly. Where? Nowhere. That's why your argument is a steaming load.

Plus, the burden of proof is on you, not on me. Even then, you imply I have to defend something validated by educated doctors from you, a teenage girl on the internet. There is indeed a losing battle here, but I'm not the one fighting it.

Where exactly has psychology come up in my argument? It's neat how you spout off blind criticisms in a scattershot attempt to make a rebuttal, when you just keep talking in circles without once attempting to actually defend what you are. Then again, why fight a losing battle right?

It just wasn't important enough for me to remember I quoted it.

There's plenty of evidence in favor of religion, that's why there's still religion. Black holes and most of our astronomical science is sketchy and patched together (such as black holes and dark matter being literally 100% speculation to account for gravitational anomalies) since science is still torn between whether or not the main binding force of the universe is gravity or electromagnetism. Since electromagnetism is considerably more powerful and has a mountain of solid evidence to support it, it makes you wonder why the infinite-gravity wells imagined by scientists to patch together a sketchy theory are still mainstream.

The Bible never once says that the Earth is the center of the solar system. The clergy believed that the Earth had to be the center of the universe since they believed that Hell was at the center of the Earth, and logically, would make Hell the furthest thing from God in existence, since God himself existed outside of creation.
When did I once reference scientific evidence of black holes or dark matter?  Mathematics is the only absolute form of proof in the universe, sweetheart.  Maybe you should do your homework before posting.  Oh, and speaking of things you're obviously unaware of:

http://biblebabble.curbjaw.com/errors.htm

And, yes, the people who originally sited the solar system's existence thought of it to have been based entirely around earth.