Author Topic: Facebook guy kills dogs for barking - ARGUMENTS  (Read 23612 times)

Why are we even arguing, Im pretty sure most of us agree that this kid shouldnt have killed the two dogs.

I'm having a lot of trouble quoting large posts on my phone so:

@lalam: ok like I implied (bc you'd get all literal on me if I said "said"), you're embarrassing yourself by making a stupid argument in a stupid way. it's also pretty clear that you're trying to make yourself seem smarter by using complex words. I would believe someone if they told me you were using a thesaurusyeah whatever kiddo doubt it
I presented a factual basis on the stance of human intellect.  Your perception of my rhetoric isn't an absolute standard.

that might matter if I was talking about the literal definition of emotion
Because the connotation is much different...?
It promotes the same effect, no?

Because we're more intelligent?  How does it make us more valuable?  On what grounds are you creating this argument?  As far as I'm concerned, you lack the basic comprehension to view the perspectives of any other species, therefore you promote a biased view which cannot be used as an argument.
We're more intelligent than plants. Lets get rid of them for being in the way.

Please don't kill me for doing this.

Plants are like Eukaryotic (or Prokaryotic can't remember) cells. They're alive but don't have a nucleus. (or brain in this case)

But they are intellectually inferior.  Even though they produce the very element which humans need to survive, they are, according to Dusty's standards, inferior.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2012, 01:11:51 AM by Lalam24 »

Also this could go beyond the extent of "it was just a dog and it shouldn't be bugging something bigger than it"

Because he had no remorse in the slightest when ending something's life for making a noise.
Now imagine him in a workplace, with a boss smaller than him giving him stuff every day. If he can't handle a loving bark then he's pretty pathetic and wouldn't be able to handle stressful, meaningful, human yelling.

I presented a factual basis on the stance of human intellect.  Your perception of my rhetoric isn't an absolute standard.
this is exactly what I'm talking aboutI
Because the connotation is much different...?
It promotes the same effect, no?
yes, no. if I say that fish don't feel emotion, everyone around me isn't going to correct me on the fact that they do actually have endorphins excreted from their wiggly-poos into their left urethral gland tubes

this is exactly what I'm talking aboutI
Oh, okay, so using the english language appropriately is just a way of trying to sound smart, and there's absolutely nothing that can refute it.  Remember when I called you a child?  This is why.

yes, no. if I say that fish don't feel emotion, everyone around me isn't going to correct me on the fact that they do actually have endorphins excreted from their wiggly-poos into their left urethral gland tubes
The term having a scientific background doesn't imply that it isn't still the same term...  Fish have emotions, according to both the common view of emotion and its definition.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2012, 01:20:48 AM by Lalam24 »

But they are intellectually inferior.  Even though they produce the very element which humans need to survive, they are, according to Dusty's standards, inferior.
Never saw a plant write a book. Only good for making books.

Oh, okay, so using the english language appropriately is just a way of trying to sound smart, and there's absolutely nothing that can refute it.  Remember when I called you a child?  This is why.
How dare you have nearly perfect English. That's bad.

Never saw a plant write a book. Only good for making books.
They also produce something that uh, gets carried around in our bodies in our blood in order for us to uh...


live?


Never saw a plant write a book. Only good for making books.
ohhohoh

this stood out sry
Oh no, I made a spelling error, even though it was still coherent!  I must be the worst person alive!
« Last Edit: September 24, 2012, 01:22:31 AM by Lalam24 »

this stood out sry
I will now use that word because it actually sounds amusing.


I will now use that word because it actually sounds amusing.
like scientits