Earth 6.0 - Vothus

[Swat 3]

You're worse than I am at insults.

That's a goal.

Being it I have no Offense in social conversations, it must be your IQ too.

[Ad Bot]

[blazerblock2]

That... made absolutely no sense...

[SWAT One]

gj Swat, gj.

[Swat 3]

That... made absolutely no sense...

You are worse than I am at insults.

If I suck incredibly bad, you must be bad.

Though, lets not fight in here :(
Training

Economy Growth

Zergo Tech

Ideas:
N/A
Progress [Two projects per R&D station]:

• MVEMPRSJ ~ 75%
• Satellite: Communication/GPS ~ 30%[/u[[/color]

Completed:
N/A

[SWAT One]

R&D:  RSMT  ~  COMPLETED
    Upgrades: 15%
R&D:  ULAF/SAA  ~  78%
R&D:  Pi1M  ~  70%

[Mikoyan]

How's the USP station coming along?

[Swat 3]

I also state this:
The SMII was made during the USC times. That was a long while ago. It's like you are saying that the SMII is the old computer, and our DAVSAM sucks, even though it is a modern desktop computer.

[Mikoyan]

That's also like saying the A-10 sucks because it was introduced in 1977. So shut up.

[SWAT One]

You don't even know what an SM-II does, do you?  Fly your entire air force over Svernloch, I dare you.

[Swat 3]

You don't even know what an SM-II does, do you?  Fly your entire air force over Svernloch, I dare you.

It tracks unidentified planes, shoots them down with two methods. Laser guided and heat seakers.

That's what I think, at least.

So basically, all of you are saying that I cannot even attempt to make a better SAM than the SMII system?

That makes sense, being it that I was researching it for more than 3 years ingame.

[SWAT One]

And same for the SMIIs.  They are entirely automated.  We can register all the objects that we want, set up the SM-II systems on auto-fire, and nothing, and I mean NOTHING will get in our borders.  If a satellite sees an immigrant hopping the border, a Tom-II will fire and take out that forgeter.

Yes, it tracks more than just planes.

If you walk over the border while the SM-IIs are on auto-fire, you will be hit by high-grain explosives at Mach 3 or greater.

[Swat 3]

Same for our SAM systems. Though it can be switched from auto to manual, nothing but the spots we didn't build our SAM sights in the areas, in which Svernloch DID(Having a large amount of time.) If the enemy uses some sort of Electromagnetic Smokescreen that alters both heat seeking and lasers, it most likely took details of the plane or object in general and will track it with video feeds.

Though, the details of these features are kept SILENT.

[SWAT One]

Except that if it was electromagnetically disguised, you can't get a lock on it anyways because no data would be returned from the craft.  That's like saying that you could shoot down a VAC-71 from 6.5 with an SAM while it's invisible.

[Swat 3]

Except that if it was electromagnetically disguised, you can't get a lock on it anyways because no data would be returned from the craft.  That's like saying that you could shoot down a VAC-71 from 6.5 with an SAM while it's invisible.

Same for a SMII.

[SWAT One]

Of course.  At that rate, SM-IIs can be remote controlled, so it doesn't even matter.

However, when I think about it, you gave me an idea.

R&D:  LFRWSM2  ~  70%  (Starting at a high number because, well, it has been made before and it's actually low-tech from the 20^th Century.)  Thank you, Serbia.