Poll

REVOKE?!

Yes
254 (70.2%)
No
108 (29.8%)

Total Members Voted: 361

Author Topic: Petition to revoke Ephialtes' adminship  (Read 33236 times)

Welp, I never caught up with that arguement.
Fake or not, Ephi was still trying to desperately stamp it out.
This is true. People keep pulling up buried examples of how Ephialtes abuses his powers.

STOP EPHI 2012

WE CAN DO THIS, JUST WATCH THIS 30 MINUTE VIDEO AND BUY A BAG OF stuffTY MERCHANDISE TO SPREAD THE WORD AND WE WILL MAGICALLY MAKE A MODERATOR DISAPPEAR
nickelob ultra for admin 2012

I have to post this whenever Ephi's general douchery comes up in discussion.



Personally disliking something is no reason to decline user-submitted content.  If he declined it for quality reasons, that's not what he indicated.  If he declined it to avoid drama, he could have been nicer about it, and it sure hasn't helped.

^ um okay i don't like mlp either but that's a bit much no????


That's really loving stupid. It is okay to have an opinion on MLP, but moderators shouldn't remove/decline things they don't agree with. That's like if Kompressor removed vehicles because he didn't think they looked good.

That's really loving stupid. It is okay to have an opinion on MLP, but moderators shouldn't remove/decline things they don't agree with. That's like if Kompressor removed vehicles because he didn't think they looked good.
or if Ephialtes removed all my Star Trek addons (i have alot on RTB) just because he hates Star Trek.

That's like if Kompressor removed vehicles because he didn't think they looked good.
he'd be removing a default part of the game wtf that's even worse than removing a user-made add-on

Personally disliking something is no reason to decline user-submitted content.
Can we see the the actual prints too?

I mean, it could have been declined for being MLP stuff, instead of MLP stuff.

I have to post this whenever Ephi's general douchery comes up in discussion.

Personally disliking something is no reason to decline user-submitted content.  If he declined it for quality reasons, that's not what he indicated.  If he declined it to avoid drama, he could have been nicer about it, and it sure hasn't helped.
good. it probably didnt fit into the game anyway.

good. it probably didnt fit into the game anyway.
and you can just as easily say that warhammer or star trek doesn't either, because they are franchises too and have nothing to do with lego. or that pirate anime show you like so much.

and you can just as easily say that warhammer or star trek doesn't either, because they are franchises too and have nothing to do with lego. or that pirate anime show you like so much.
yeah I would agree with that.

your point?


this is why we need a democratic monarchy

and you can just as easily say that warhammer or star trek doesn't either, because they are franchises too and have nothing to do with lego. or that pirate anime show you like so much.
you're SO bad at this lol. warhammer and star trek can be made to fit into the game. you can stylize them to fit into the game (like i do). his prints were probably direct rips from google images. it would be like me ripping battlefield 3 character models and releasing them as a blockland add-on.

Personally disliking something is no reason to decline user-submitted content.
And that's where you roll out the classic "It's his service that he built and hosts; he's under no obligation to run it in any particular way." argument.