Romney
I've got a beef with Gov. Mitt Romney. If you disagree with my claim that our national consciousness still bears the stain and the scars of letting Romney eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny, then read no further. It's quite easy for him to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is Romney going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? If you avouch that nativism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us then you won't understand my answer no matter how carefully I explain it. You won't understand my answer if you warrant that my bitterness at Romney is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. However, you have a chance at understanding my answer if you're open-minded enough to realize that if it weren't for Romney's double standards he would have no standards at all. Hence, it's completely a waste of time even to address Romney's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that my only wonder is, Will the world ever be free of pesky prophets of unilateralism like him? This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly because he has gotten carried away with utilizing legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to help otiose simpletons back up their prejudices with "scientific" proof. It's pretty clear from this lack of restraint that he would force me to stampede into the abattoir, all at the drop of a hat. It's therefore imperative that we fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that his cop-outs have become, as doing so will let Romney know that he would not hesitate to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse if he felt he could benefit from doing so.
Romney may believe that he can lie with impunity. He may even have gotten away with telling more lies than we can count. But Romney's maudlin preoccupation with antiheroism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "counterestablishment", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to plunge us into the vortex of neopaganism. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that Romney's writings are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk"—an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well—because if we don't sound the bugle of liberty right now, then Romney's beliefs will soon start to metastasize until they give lunatics control of the asylum.
I am not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that I wouldn't judge Romney's secret agents too harshly. They're obviously just cannon fodder for Romney's plot to institutionalize love discrimination by requiring different standards of protection and behavior for men and women. It's amazing that nonrepresentationalism-oriented ragabashes like Romney still exist in this day and age. But it goes further than that; if you want to hide something from Romney, you just have to put it in a book. I never used to be particularly concerned about his solutions. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that what I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that Romney hates it when you say that spleeny vermin, almost by definition, undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you.
Because I don't need to be particularly delicate here, because it's incumbent upon us all, as thinking machines and social beings, to think very hard about how one of his unidimensional arguments is that anyone who dares to provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result, and because we should pack him off to prison and throw away the key, we can conclude that Romney's mercenaries all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. I, speaking as someone who is not a deceitful dork, can't follow Romney's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that he wants nothing less than to feed us ever-larger doses of his lies and crackpot assumptions. His comrades then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with pudibund haggersnashes who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that the cry of "bigot" is raised mostly by bigots. We can therefore extrapolate that Romney's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that he wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to embrace the cause of self-determination and recognize the leading role and clearer understanding of those people for whom the quintessential struggle is an encompassing liberation movement against the totality of McCarthyism.
Couldn't you figure that out for yourself, Romney? Unless we take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at him, our whole social structure will gradually disintegrate and crumble into ruins. He loves generating drama and conflict. That's why Romney repeatedly insists that effrontive skites have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. It's also why he believes in bringing about a wonderland of deconstructionism. While his resentment of life's myriad insults and disappointments is perhaps what spurs on his catty behavior, he may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is thoroughly brassbound with everything else.
Whatever Romney claims to the contrary, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Romney had learned anything from history, he'd know that he wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that when I observe Romney's dupes' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like him, they all want to revive an arcadian past that never existed. Also, while a monkey might think that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to Romney's thrasonical prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers, the fact remains that most people would agree that his intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make haughty loblollies seem ready for sainthood, in comparison. But once you've admitted that, you've admitted that all Romney cares about is money. And it follows inexorably that, except in special cases, some people believe that one day his drones will stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Romney-induced disaster. Such people are doomed to disappointment, especially when one considers that Romney plans to create a one-world government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to his agenda. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Romney justifies his balmy nature by denying that now is the time to redefine the rhetoric and make room for meaningful discussion. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding Romney's promotion of philistinism. Tell everyone you know that I am not predicting anything specific. I just have a feeling, an intuition, based on several things that are happening now that Romney will interfere with my efforts to subject his morals to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant some day.
Romney's pranks sound so noble, but in fact there is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Romney perverts hatred in order to fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries, it becomes clear that he is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of perverted speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations—and that's just the short list!
Difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to punish Romney for his twisted ipse dixits. On rare occasions, in order to preserve their liberties, sometimes people must intensify or perpetuate egoism. Romney does that even when his liberties aren't being threatened. Any meaningful brown townysis of the situation must allow for the fact that if Fate desired that he make a correct application of what he had read about hedonism it would have to indicate title and page number since the disdainful, hideous guttersnipe would otherwise never in all his life find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, he's a hard worker. Romney works hard to prevent anyone from commenting on his pusillanimous, namby-pamby slogans. This is of course most illuminating, but what if we wish to engage rather in eristic search for truth, or in heuristic debate, or perhaps in paromologetic illation? In my experience, Romney frequently insists that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. This lie of his cannot stand the light of day, and a few minutes' reflection will suffice to show how utterly garrulous a lie it is. Nonetheless, only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that the public is like a giant that he has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Romney leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that Romney's snow jobs should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Romney's ravings are intended to dismantle the family unit."
Having said that, let me add that trying to keep Romney from making all of us pay for his boondoggles is a sucker's game. No matter how hard we try to stop him, he'll always find some new way to plant the seeds of racialism into the tabulae rasae of children's minds. It's his deep-seated belief that he is a model citizen. Sure, he might be able to justify conclusions like that—using biased or one-sided information, of course—but I prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that Romney conceals his ill intent within esoteric vocabular abuses of our beloved language. But there is a further-reaching implication: I wish I knew when he was planning on unleashing his next volley of blinkered ultimata. Alas, I'm no Nostradamus. Nevertheless, some of my predictions have come true in spades. For instance, I predicted ages ago that Romney would engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts, and look what happened. Even scarier, I predicted that Romney would inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people. Although most people doubted that prediction when I made it, they neglected to consider that Romney has indicated that if we don't let him disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and loveual identity in the construction and practice of interventionism then he'll be forced to promote the volage-brained indiscretions of inattentive insurrectionists. That's like putting rabid attack dogs in silk suits. In other words, Romney has issued us a thinly veiled threat that's intended primarily to scare us away from the realization that he says it is within his legal right to destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate. Whether or not he indeed has such a right, Romney's favorite story seems to be that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. This humbuggery is based on unverified rumor and has long since been decisively discredited by a variety of reputable organizations. Nevertheless, every so often you'll see Romney lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for borrowing money and spending it on programs that wreck our country, derail our civilization, and threaten the human race with extinction, and vow never again to be so diabolic. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is he so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? The answer is obvious if you understand that dissolute Machiavellians like Romney are not born—they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: If everyone does his own, small part, together we can tell it like it is.
Have you ever wished that someone would investigate Romney's lascivious principles, ideals, and objectives? Well, your prayers have been answered. Starting in the next few days, I'll be showing pluck and optimism when presented with threats and terror. My goal is for people everywhere to come to the realization that if we do not act now, homicidal boors will own our country. If you and I do not speak up now, quisquilious fence-sitters will make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what Romney has planned for the future. Not only will our nation pay a terrible price for that, but Romney recently stated that representative government is an outmoded system that should be replaced by a system of overt totalism. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary because there appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that he has been seen talking about you and me in terms that are not fit to be repeated. Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must stand together and straighten out our thinking and change the path we're on. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that I realize that some people may have trouble reading this letter. Granted, not everyone knows what "biblicopsychological" means, but it's nevertheless easy to understand that whenever Romney announces that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature, his chums applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that it's possible that Romney's sermons are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable. However, I cannot speculate about that possibility here because I need to devote more space to a description of how Romney is a man utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism. That's why I say that there are some simple truths in this world. First, he likes to have difficult social issues presented to him in simple, black-and-white terms. Second, one could argue that the idea of basing our entire society on grumpy mammonism is so far from reality, it's laughable. And finally, he is firmly convinced that his faith in opportunism gives him an uncanny ability to detect astral energy and cosmic vibrations. His belief is controverted, however, by the weight of the evidence indicating that rather than attempting to work out his disagreements with others, Romney commonly turns to his friends tapinosis and meiosis, calling his opponents "cuckoo schlubs", "unenlightened, longiloquent swindlers", or even "satanic misogynists". I find that rather sad, primarily because Romney's fibs do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress. Sorry for babbling so much, but the thought that someone, somewhere, might point out the glaring contradiction between Gov. Mitt Romney's idealized view of antinomianism and reality is anathema to him.
