Ephilates: Seriously bro?

[indyjones]

if a moderator thinks we shouldn't post something somewhere, we as regular members are bound by that. that is how it has always worked

you do feel more entitled because you think you shouldn't be bound by it lol

I was never informed not to post there until he started deleting posts

[Ad Bot]

[Cajetan]

well no, it started because indyjones feels like he's more entitled than the rest of us regular members

kalphiter just hopped on for the ride and to try and make it out as a massive moral wrong and injustice

Mhh, yeah. Maybe I did misunderstood this a little bit.
But well, wouldn't Kalphiter have started provoking with "lag in Ny01" etc. then indyjones wouldn't even had the idea to play the white knight for kalphiter.

I don't feel more entitled, I just don't want my posts deleted if I'm not breaking any rules.

You didn't break the rules? That's new to me. Let's see... the word starts with letter S and ends with letter m.
No. You still haven't got it. Ephialtes thread wasn't made for flaming, criticism or anything like that. You guys are breaking that rule and have to live with the consequence that your posts about it are going to get deleted. Also, Ephialtes gave up on the discussion... You can be happy that your review(it wasn't actually a review, but well) still exists.
With other words, your post about how you hate Ephialtes or anything like that goes to "Drama" -> You didn't do that, with the consequence your posts being deleted. Pretty simple.

I was never informed not to post there until he started deleting posts

It's a global rule, my friend.

[wound]

I was never informed not to post there until he started deleting posts

if he deletes your post, you should not continue to post like you were, it's common sense.

he does not want stuff spewed in the thread, rather much anywhere.

[indyjones]

if he deletes your post, you should not continue to post like you were, it's common sense.

he does not want stuff spewed in the thread, rather much anywhere.

I actually didn't post like I did before after he deleted my first post

[wound]

what

[Böltster]

I was never informed not to post there until he started deleting posts

"... until he started deleting posts"

having posts deleted is a pretty clear indicator that you are not meant to post it there. if this was anything more than a false sense of self entitlement, you would have caught on after the first deletion and moved on

[SailorMan]

Indy's was locked and moved....

[indyjones]

what

My first post was "10/10 would laugh again"

The other ones were comments about that one getting deleted, so please stfu

[Ephialtes]

I don't feel more entitled, I just don't want my posts deleted if I'm not breaking any rules.

You kick up a fuss about your useless non-contributing post getting removed? You yourself are a useless non-contributing member of this community and if it were up to me you'd be removed too. Again, learn your place. This sense of unwarranted entitlement seems to be a common theme.

[Cajetan]

I actually didn't post like I did before after he deleted my first post

Ephi: *deletes indyjones post* because for stuffting in Ephi's thread
indy:*RAGE* replies 3-4 times about stopping deleting his posts.
Ephi: *deletes them again* Because of spam.

Well, that must be true.

[Böltster]

My first post was "10/10 would laugh again"

The other ones were comments about that one getting deleted, so please stfu

so on the first post deletion you were unaware, ok
the second time you posted something different and it was deleted, ok another lesson learnt

so then why did you keep going lol

[YourBuddyBill]

You kick up a fuss about your useless non-contributing post getting removed? You yourself are a useless non-contributing member of this community and if it were up to me you'd be removed too. Again, learn your place. This sense of unwarranted entitlement seems to be a common theme.

Ephi, I think part of the point is that you certainly don't moderate threads that don't involve you or Lub with that level of strictness.

[otto-san]

You kick up a fuss about your useless non-contributing post getting removed? You yourself are a useless non-contributing member of this community and if it were up to me you'd be removed too. Again, learn your place. This sense of unwarranted entitlement seems to be a common theme.

If you're deleting non-contributing posts, that's fine, I guess?

You have a lot of work to do, in that case.

[Ephialtes]

Ephi, I think part of the point is that you certainly don't moderate threads that don't involve you or Lub with that level of strictness.

Of course not, it's not feasible to. Too bad that it's not "fair" that you guys can't do it too - welcome to life.

[Yosher]

what kind of point are people even trying to prove?