yes, why would you? why would you play a game that's supposed to be anything? would it be because you would like to? that might be the reason why you would. now if you don't want to play it, you don't have to. that's the great thing about games, don't you agree?
that's different completely
you're saying that the game is supposed to be bad, which is a bad thing
games are supposed to be good remember
I'm sure your personal definition of "regular gameplay" applies to most genres of games. I'm sure Chessmaster 3000, Guitar Hero and Journey all have "regular gameplay" and are therefore perfectly valid (and therefore likable) games.
regular gameplay was a poor choice of words on my part, so instead, i'll explain my point using the famous pros and cons rating system
cons: the concept of the fighting was poorly executed and the story was uninteresting
pros: neat film grain and artwork
as you can see, the most important game factors are in the cons section which = bad
which means this has failed to provide satisfactory usage of what is obviously most of the game and when most of the game is bad then well...
i'm sure you get my point
