Author Topic: Glass - General friend.  (Read 18517 times)


You both are idiots.
I really hope you get banned for flame, for what now? the 8th time?

Now you are mad because no one likes you and you want to spew it on me now.
Zay, Palladium, Goldtits, Sphere, Cciamlazy, Owl(Nymth), I could keep going but I have no actual valid reason to.

And I'm not spewing it on you because of that at all, you're just being a general starfish to people so It deserved a drama, sorry lol.

Glass has his moments of being a douche sometimes, but Wound/Juice takes the cake.

Direct orders from General friend!
Send in the troops!

Now you are mad because no one likes you and you want to spew it on me now.
Have to sort of agree with this.

Glass lately hasn't been as annoying as Wound has been.
Glass has been replying to Wound's comments simply because Wound starts bashing on people for no reason.

/Commence long ass reply to quotes from OP


First quote in the OP is justified.


You bumped this for that? Idiot.

Even others got mad.

aaa you bumped it
walk i thought you were smarter than this


Second quote from OP is justified.
He noticed that they were arguing off-topic and wanted to change it.
Wound said "lold hard" like a handicap would and Glass pinpointed it out.





Third quote from OP is justified as well.



He may have said the OP was horrible but he still agreed.



Fourth quote have to admit was pretty flaming but it was an IRC chat with Wound.

Glass you do realize, you totally flamed him. GG.

Not saying I disagree with OP.



Fifth quote is from the forth quote.

Actually, It seems like you're the one who started the argument.



Sixth quote is from the fourth quote.

Ok, that kinda makes both of you look like idiots, mostly you imo.



Most of the quotes from the OP are justified of what Glass said except the IRC thing which he shouldn't have posted.

So just because it's justified it gives him the right to blatantly flame? yeah no.

uh, yeah
maybe if you weren't a huge dipstuff it would be bad for him to call you a huge dipstuff, but it just so happens that you are a huge dipstuff, so he can totally call you a huge dipstuff, you huge dipstuff

So just because it's justified it gives him the right to blatantly flame? yeah no.
Blatantly flame by saying "Idiot" after someone bumped something that was 3- 5 weeks old, which is idiotic?
If you truly think it is flame go ahead and report it.

Then he pointed out how you acted mentally stupid because you "lold hard" at him dropping a petty argument about new years eve parties.

Then he said stupid in the third quote lol.
The kid the OP was talking about did act stupid though.

Oh and hey, learn to practice what you preach.

you were being an starfish in general.
because you're an starfish.
Glass flames alot and is an starfish
If you can't, forget off.
you're just pulling stuff out of your ass lmao.
stop twisting the truth friend.

Does this kid have some kind of superiority complex

Oh and hey, learn to practice what you preach.
hey, it's justified!

hey, it's justified!
It's not justified because the people you said it to were people arguing against you with actual reason.
Glass argued with you because you brought up his new years party:

lold at the irony.

and also lold at your attempt at a new years eve party :-(

Then when he tries dropping it you have to say something immature as usual:
lold hard

Just like the whole "exactly" situation.
Which proves my point:
You did say "exactly."
You always do when you think you 'proved' yourself right.
you had to go and say something immature like "heh exactly."

Another glass thread!
Wow, this one will do so much more than the last two dozen have! Thanks wound! (who himself is a known friend)

Most of the examples of Glass being an "starfish" actually seem justified in their own contexts. I don't think OP is in the right position to create such a thread though when you consider OPs previous actions it's probably drama mongering for attention anyway.

Most of the examples of Glass being an "starfish" actually seem justified in their own contexts. I don't think OP is in the right position to create such a thread though when you consider OPs previous actions it's probably drama mongering for attention anyway.
Exactly this ^