The topics, in chronological order by creation time:
Ephialtes: be negative in kalph's, but i'll clear your post if you are in mine
Created 17:15:37, locked 17:17:00
What the forget Ephialtes?
Created 17:34:04, locked 17:34:04
Ephialtes
Created 17:40:39, locked 17:44:33
I created a topic, deleted within a few minutes.
I created that topic again, it was also deleted within a few minutes. I claim that here.
At no point above this line were there any threads open at the same time.
First one; the one he locked. Second one; a revival of the first one. Third one; a recreation of the first two. You're right, they weren't posted at the same time, but they were essentially the same topic. So, yes, while you were more correct on the recollection, you made no point to argue besides "my recollection was more accurate." Grats on the better memory of unimportant drama events.
Ephilates: Seriously bro?
Created 17:59:21, left open (this got designated as a "main" topic, and the two other concurrent topics were locked, seems fair)
Ephialtes - abusing Forum powers
Created 18:01:22, locked 18:10:34
Ephialtes Locking Topics
Created 18:05:41, locked 18:13:14
You can view these (posted December 14th) on pages 6 and 7 in drama. Oddly, your recollection of events was not accurate yet mine was 100% accurate.
These are the topics that were created at the same time from my post. They were all created within 5 minutes of eachother, so Ephi locked two and left one as the "main" topic. Aside from leaving out two topics that were duplicates of the first, I don't see where I was wrong.
This is in the OP, please read before posting.
Preventing "flame wars" is mostly a bullstuff idea and only upheld by suckers like you and Ephialtes who need means to defend injustice and criticism.
Well first off that's a purely subjective idea. Second, no it's not. He's trying to conduct business in that thread. Go walk into a local business establishment and get the entire place to brawl. If you don't get kicked out, massive props to you. I'll tell you you're right. Actually, you'd probably be banned for life, so Ephialtes is doing you a favor.
Not sure where the fallacy is.
That's funny, because once I was the only person to report a lag issue and I was silenced pretty quickly. That's not stuff-posting, or it is at least stuff-posting in Ephialtes' eyes because the lag was never acknowledged.
Well, first off the fallacy. You're directly attacking me, instead of my argument. You're saying I'm uniformed, I'm ignorant, and I'm bad at research. It's a fallacy because that's irrelevant to the quality of my argument. Second, your post about the lag issue was a stuffpost. If you'd said, "I'm getting lag problems on XXX's server on NY0Y, do your logs reflect this?" instead of saying "Uh oh, looks like NY0X is lagging out!" or whatever you said, the post would not have been deleted. Again, I can't blame you for not being able to tell the difference but trust me, there is one. Maybe if you look up word connotations you may be able to understand a little.
There are tons examples like that, explore the ones beyond what's in the OP.
They're all stuffposts.
Poll