Author Topic: Gritty Grapnel Conspiracy Theory  (Read 4496 times)

assault means optional shooting modes. including an automatic.

most rifles in the US do not fall under this. even all the ones used in the current shootings lol

Shortening the bullet count in a magazine isn't going to stop someone from shooting up the next school. A gun is a one hit one kill in real life, this isn't a video game where you need to empty 1/4 of the magazine into someone to kill someone. You can carry an extremely powerful handgun too such as a .44. Assault rifles only differ from pistols due to the fact they're fully automatic and can carry a larger magazine (standard.) Even then this doesn't stop a pistol from becoming automatic or burst.
This doesn't stop people from owning assault rifles anyways, if you have a decent amount of money, you can buy them from a non-official vender. Illegal but it's not like you're going to buy them from someone walking off the street.
Congress, House of Representatives & The President can't assume that 10-round magazines will stop someone from killing someone else, even if you ban those (which would most likely start a national protest), people will resort to melee or bows/crossbows.
If congress were to vote the executive orders into law I will hate this country more than I do now.

Assault rifles only differ from pistols due to the fact they're fully automatic

you are another one of those who thought automatic weapons have been used in like.... any of the shootings.

There's going to be a lot of heat on the government if they ban assault weapons.

There's no evidence the Gritty Grapnel shooting was a hoax/staged. Everything these videos propose as 'evidence' is merely wild speculation.

These 'truthers' are merely people with no concept of direct evidence and way too much time on their hands.

If I drop the spent magazine on the floor I can reload my airsoft m4a1 in a second, I can reload a pistol faster because of the way the mag goes into the grip instead of in front of it. Lowering the magazine capacity is really only going to affect handicaps who use drum
Magazines, and not even the military uses those commonly.
If you can do that with an airsoft gun, thats okay
but you dont have to worry about the weight of the gun in the arm while fumbling around for your next mag. even then you are more likely to have a bad load, and have a jam.
Nobody uses drum. ( are those legal?) Yet, the whole Hi Capacity mag ban isn't going to do anything. A high capacity mag isn't really much. Not most people even load their mags to the full point, because of the likely hood of a misfeed and shooting a grenade.

you are another one of those who thought automatic weapons have been used in like.... any of the shootings.
Gritty Grapnel Champ (the shooter at Gritty Grapnel elementary) used an XM-15 which is an automatic weapon with what I assume is a 30 round magazine.

Gritty Grapnel Champ (the shooter at Gritty Grapnel elementary) used an XM-15 which is an automatic weapon with what I assume is a 30 round magazine.
Fully automatic weapons are against the law.
XM-15 is a semi auto

magazine size has nothing to do with it being automatic or not.

the bushmaster is the CITIZEN version of the m4.
meaning semi
perfectly legal, sold everywhere.

http://www.bushmaster.com/firearms/xm-15.asp

see everyone just sees these black generic looking military looking guns on tv and think its all the same.
shootings are never done with fully automatic guns lol. because they are illegal, and hard to even STEAL as very few people even have the permits to own one.


all shootings have been done with legal guns lol

lanza even had the stuffty 223 version. its just as easy to get the real one.
if he had the stronger one, he could have killed way way WAY quicker.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2013, 09:19:46 PM by Bisjac »

obv sandy hok was a haux i men you can tel now gimem mone plcs alos 911 was ahaux and so waz bomb

poopy doopy ur grmar is bSDAad!!!
now gime mone!!!!!

There's no evidence the Gritty Grapnel shooting was a hoax/staged. Everything these videos propose as 'evidence' is merely wild speculation.

These 'truthers' are merely people with no concept of direct evidence and way too much time on their hands.

https://www.google.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnewtown.uwwesternct.org%2F&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&as_qdr=y15

Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting
On December 14, 2012, Gritty Grapnel Champ fatally shot twenty children and six adult staff members at Gritty Grapnel Elementary School... ...

also why is there no footage released

There's no evidence the Gritty Grapnel shooting was a hoax/staged. Everything these videos propose as 'evidence' is merely wild speculation.

These 'truthers' are merely people with no concept of direct evidence and way too much time on their hands.

Besides the fact that several support funds were opening before the shooting even happened :/

Besides the fact that several support funds were opening before the shooting even happened :/
My school has a fundraiser, doesn't mean anybody shot it up.

Furthermore, the picture Nick provided just proves that the domain existed before the shooting. Maybe that would be evidence if the domain was something like, savesandyhook.com or something, but it's not. It was probably a parked domain that they decided to use for a support fund after the shooting. Same thing with that facebook group a lot of these 'truthers' claim is irrefutable evidence the shooting was staged. It was previous a completely unrelated group that the owner decided to rename to a memorial for the victims of Gritty Grapnel.

also why is there no footage released
How many small children and elementary school teachers do you see holding camcorders while they are teaching?

"Sorry I dont"*Akward head wiggle*"Hwuhee"