You just said one of the very first consoles was bad because no one knew what they were doing.
It's hard to say that and not look handicapped.
The problem didn't lie in the console. There WERE good games for the Atari. The problem was standards. Nintendo 64 complicated gaming a lot with 3D (yeah yeah yeah PS1 and PC I know) worlds and the more advanced memory storage. What did this mean? It measn bad companies couldn't release games anymore. In reality, anybody could make a game for the NES if they had the money, the cartridge, the time, and the will. It wouldn't be a good game, but still a game. This was the main reason that NES through GameCube was all a very good time for gaming: CARE. During the second half of the GameCube's lifetime, a lot of companies that were known for making games because they honestly wanted to began doing it simply for the money. This caused games to go down in quality and enjoyability. The same can be said for before the NES, I suppose.
What is nonsensical is every time there is some sort of argument/ disagreement on the internet, on party always has to say "opinion".
I know. It's still a gosh darn opinion.
It doesn't factually prove anything. Now lets stop this derailment. This is nonsensical.
Because it is. Also this is turning into an argument, which I was never intending it to become. Simply stating opinions. I don't have anything to prove, you don't have anything to prove, Cyber doesn't have anything to prove. That's what speech is, isn't it? Sharing of opinions?