Author Topic: Black Mesa VS Aperture Science  (Read 4463 times)

dude are you even
I said that their artificial intelligence was well made and functioned right, not that it listened to stuff.
if an ai doesn't follow the second law, it isn't functioning right
glados was a rogue ai and was not programmed correctly

is a computer more artificial and more intelligent if it can kill people?

im not understand why its a good thing lol. seems to me gladOS was broken as hell.

glados violated every law of robotics, so she is not a proper robot
aperture cannot program stuff correctly and black mesa is superior

well, I suppose for the porpouse that it was programmed in it didn't work right
but speaking strictly AI, as one it worked fine


also, where'd you guys even learn so many things about black mesa
I mean I haven't yet played ep1 but I don't think they talk about that much

But Aperture invented more things that worked and were safe than Black Mesa.
All Black Mesa did was add a couple of aliens.

but speaking strictly AI, as one it worked fine
according to the laws of robotics, she is not a proper robot
she broke all the laws

also, where'd you guys even learn so many things about black mesa
I mean I haven't yet played ep1 but I don't think they talk about that much
I get bored a lot

But Aperture invented more things that worked and were safe than Black Mesa.
All Black Mesa did was add a couple of aliens.
of course, because a faulty programming didn't totally kill everyone employee at aperture, hindering their technological advancement!

well all of half life 1 an half life 2 was just a list of black mesa awesomeness.

jairo: while it killed everyone at aperture, it didn't hinder their technological advancement
glados went on and invented all kinds of fun stuff
like the light bridges and what-not

jairo: while it killed everyone at aperture, it didn't hinder their technological advancement
glados went on and invented all kinds of fun stuff
like the light bridges and what-not
those were invented long before she killed everyone
continuity would suggest so considering cave johnson introduces them in those videos

werent the bridges already there? she was just using the test sites she was given.

doesn't glados say "I had just finished building them before you killed me" all over portal 2

doesn't glados say "I had just finished building them before you killed me" all over portal 2
I think she just means the testing chambers
that would make more sense since she only has control over that and not the in-lab factories (like the one that makes turrets, otherwise that plan to copy the faulty one would've been known by her)

doesn't glados say "I had just finished building them before you killed me" all over portal 2
Yeah, she said that about the laser cubes

Yeah, she said that about the laser cubes

well at least there's something she invented

anyway, over all I think aperture invented more stuff and it worked a bit better
I mean what's more reliable to use, a handheld gun that shoots portals that you go through or a random lightning-coil thingie that does random stuff and makes portals all over the place and oh my god forget I never managed to understand it

well at least there's something she invented

anyway, over all I think aperture invented more stuff and it worked a bit better
I mean what's more reliable to use, a handheld gun that shoots portals that you go through or a random lightning-coil thingie that does random stuff and makes portals all over the place and oh my god forget I never managed to understand it
yes, let's just totally ignore everything black mesa invented and forget about glados: the rogue ai that aperture invented which killed their entire employed force!