Author Topic: Why hasn't a better animated image format been made yet?  (Read 1065 times)

From my limited understanding of gifs and video, video will recycle the color of a pixel if the frame before it had a similar color at that location. But gifs don't do that, so they load slower. And what's different about animated .pngs?

If I'm wrong about anything, please educate me. :P

video actually does that?

i thought of that long ago and i didnt even

pretty sure apng exists

might've misread OP

From my limited understanding of gifs and video, video will recycle the color of a pixel if the frame before it had a similar color at that location. But gifs don't do that, so they load slower.

Gifs are usually optimized to do this.
aPNG has much better transparency support. in gifs, a pixel is either completely opaque or completely transparent, 0 or 255. aPNG's can be from 0 to 255 transparency.

After a short amount of googling, my answer has been found:
http://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/comments/16n5tn/please_explain_this_to_me/c7xkhc0
Gifs are usually optimized to do this.
aPNG has much better transparency support. in gifs, a pixel is either completely opaque or completely transparent, 0 or 255. aPNG's can be from 0 to 255 transparency.
Is that it?

Here's the first frame of your avatar.



Here's the second


Here's the ninth because it's a good example.

Here's the first frame of your avatar.



Here's the second


Here's the ninth because it's a good example.

oh ok. i looked back at the reddit post and you are right. neat.

I wish gif would kindly forget right the hell off so apng can take over.

I wish gif would kindly forget right the hell off so apng can take over.
This

This

Like seriously. This isn't 1997 anymore. We can handle larger file sizes for animated images. If an image is gonna be 5+MB, it might as well have decent quality.

As far as I know, very few browsers support .apng format. Opera can do it, and Chrome has an add-on available for animated PNG support.

But when I am designing webs and I want a two-color, indexed, blinking image gif is so awesome.

As far as I know, very few browsers support .apng format. Opera can do it, and Chrome has an add-on available for animated PNG support.
So does firefox.
It and chrome are the only two you really gotta focus on.

So does firefox.
It and chrome are the only two you really gotta focus on.
But Opera is important too.

As far as I know, very few browsers support .apng format. Opera can do it, and Chrome has an add-on available for animated PNG support.

Exactly my problem.

But when I am designing webs and I want a two-color, indexed, blinking image gif is so awesome.

Then you can use a gif for that. But when people want the bleeding-edge-state-of-the-art technology like anti-aliasing and alpha we can use apng.