Poll

Which?

Liberal
Conservative
Other

Author Topic: Conservatives vs Liberals  (Read 4314 times)

And limited government can do that just fine...?
Sure. But as limited as it can be?

thats about parties. it shouldnt even be on the poll as its not related.
Oh

1. Gun Control

Very little gun control is needed. From sniper rifles to assault rifles to pistols, I think anyone who can afford a weapon they want should be able to purchase one.

2. Unemployment

Globalization has put a lot of Americans out of a job. I don't know what to do about this.

But, on a related note, affirmative action is bullstuff. There should be no quotas for hiring minorities or accepting them into colleges. If you want to only hire white people, that's your own business. If it fails, maybe next time you'll hire more black people. If it succeeds, good for you.

I'm an old-school liberal -- leaning more towards conservatism.

I think guns should be legal for all; however not assault weapons of any kind.

Unemployment? That's broad. I don't have an opinion on it, it's simple. If you are unemployed; you don't have a job.

I think guns should be legal for all; however not assault weapons of any kind.
Classic igloos.

the reason i'm not too hot on assault weapons is like

why

why on EARTH would you need an assault weapon? "what if twelve dudes all decide to mug me at once?" these are not things that happen 24/7, and by the way i can understand having a pistol or even a 12 gauge, yeah, but have you ever heard the story where a child defended his house with his dad's AR-15 whilst being robbed? no, you hear stories of crazed psychopaths shooting up schools and movie theaters in cold blood.

i donno.

2. Unemployment
But, on a related note, affirmative action is bullstuff. There should be no quotas for hiring minorities or accepting them into colleges. If you want to only hire white people, that's your own business. If it fails, maybe next time you'll hire more black people. If it succeeds, good for you.
There shouldn't be a quota, but not for the same reason you think there shouldn't be one. It should be against the law to selectively only hire people of one race or gender, because that's discrimination. Your rights end where someone else's begin. You can hate blacks or Asians or women or any minority but you can't deny them equal employment. That's not freedom, that's not how it should work. I feel there shouldn't be a quota because people need to get their heads out of their asses and stop pointless hate. If you're hiring someone just because he's white and not because he's qualified, there's something wrong with you. Similarly, if you're hiring a black person to seem progressive even though there are others who are qualified, there's something wrong with you.

Sure. But as limited as it can be?
As in people should be able to purchase their guns
People shouldn't be monitored
Gay marriage shouldn't be up to the government.
In a free country, we should be able to decide things for ourselves.

It should be against the law to selectively only hire people of one race or gender, because that's discrimination. Your rights end where someone else's begin. You can hate blacks or Asians or women or any minority but you can't deny them equal employment. That's not freedom, that's not how it should work. I feel there shouldn't be a quota because people need to get their heads out of their asses and stop pointless hate. If you're hiring someone just because he's white and not because he's qualified, there's something wrong with you. Similarly, if you're hiring a black person to seem progressive even though there are others who are qualified, there's something wrong with you.
That should be up to the employer. It's his own business.

not sure what i am. i am ultra conservative on some issues, and ultra liberal on others.
:D


^^^^

Assault rifles are meant for wars.
Only if you were paranoid and afraid of the government or lived in a notorious city such as Compton, CA or Detroit, then an AR-16 would be understandable to own.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2013, 06:41:30 PM by Igloos »

That should be up to the employer. It's his own business.
Doesn't change the fact he doesn't have a right to discriminate against anyone. That's infringing on another's right to equality and justice.

Doesn't change the fact he doesn't have a right to discriminate against anyone. That's infringing on another's right to equality and justice.
But that's his own thoughts and the government shouldn't force him to think a certain way.

I think a business owner should have the right to discriminate a man from working at her lesbian strip club.

Assault weapons are meant for wars.
Only if you were paranoid and afraid of the government or lived in a notorious city such as Compton, CA or Detroit, then an AR-16 would be understandable to own.
I think you mean assault rifles, pretty much any gun is used for assault unless its firing dummies.

But that's his own thoughts and the government shouldn't force him to think a certain way.
Nonnel is right.