Author Topic: Got a new Maxx_ account.  (Read 3315 times)

Anyway, anyone know how to fix avatar issues?
Cant seem to get that pixelblockie one working.
Or is there a bug where you cant use someone elses avatar.

Alright you are right, I'm wrong. I'm sorry, I was just standing up for Maxx.
By doubting and insulting him before trying to contact him to see if your assumption was correct?

Sounds just like you!

Or is there a bug where you cant use someone elses avatar.
Nope, I am using used your (-Maxx-'s) avatar and it seems to be working just fine.
Odd. I'd say to ask Badspot about it, since I don't know.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2013, 06:15:03 PM by dargereldren »



They weren't research/gore, it was most likely dotdot
here we go again


Alright you are right, I'm wrong. I'm sorry, I was just standing up for Maxx.
mhm

it was most likely dotdot

forget you

where is your REAL proof? or should i link you to that topic i made

forget you

where is your REAL proof? or should i link you to that topic i made
i already saw that topic?
HMM
my account gets posted in dotdots topic supporting it
dotdot clearly responds to me, i supported it at first, then a few hours later im hijacked, then whoever hijacked me posted that I don't support it.
HMMMMM NOTHING SUSPICIOUS THERE RIGHT?

i already saw that topic?
HMM
my account gets posted in dotdots topic supporting it
dotdot clearly responds
HMMMMM NOTHING SUSPICIOUS THERE RIGHT?

the hacker made you post in a drama about dotdot, it was ov dotdot!

CANT BE ANYONE ELSE

the hacker made you post in a drama about dotdot, it was ov dotdot!

CANT BE ANYONE ELSE
holy stuff
i said suspicious.
thats why I ACCUSED him.
Because it was suspicious that there was a post not supporting it after I DID support it.
im not saying it was him
for the last
loving
time

the hacker made you post in a drama about dotdot, it was ov dotdot!

CANT BE ANYONE ELSE
Stop being such a sarcastic starfish, His proof is right there in the drama. Why are you such an idiot? First you make handicapped topics about a show (MLP), Then you think you have the ability to say a hijacked user isn't hijacked? What's wrong with you?

Then you think you have the ability to say a hijacked user isn't hijacked?
what

he was saying that a hijacked user wasn't necessarily hijacked by another specific user (dotdot)
Then you think you have the ability to say a post is something it isn't?

forget you

where is your REAL proof? or should i link you to that topic i made
Ok, lemme ask you this.
Where is YOUR real proof, that dotdot didn't hijack me?
Hmm?