Author Topic: Dimitri Khalezov explains WTC nuclear demolition 9/11/2001  (Read 8430 times)

I expected something out of stalker.

What is this stuff.

Yeah, the reason I follow the 'official story' isn't because it's extremely well substantiated. I just believe it because everyone else does!



The fallacy in Nymethus' reasoning is that he's assuming that people consider the 'official story' true entirely because it's predominantly popular. What he's missing is all the evidence that points to the 'official story' being true.
Explain to me what my reasoning is. I posted a video I thought was interesting. What's the problem?

Conspiracy theory: a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy%20theory)

Stop ignoring context and playing stupid in order to make a point about an "invalid" use of a word.
So, by definition, the 9/11 comission report is a conspiracy theory. What's the problem with that? Why can't we use words according to their real definition?

He's just trying to make his crazy bullstuff appear rational.

From now on, treat the term 'conspiracy theory' as synonymous with 'government conspiracy theory'. At least within the context of this thread.
What do you want? just wondering

When reading what nymethus posts I can't tell if they hardly make any sense at all because he's foreign and speaks stuffty english, or just believes in crazy stuff.