Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

[Anti-Block]

brother dose prices are cray

[Ad Bot]

[Night Fox]

can anyone explain to me why it's okay to post completely bare boobs as long as the nipples aren't showing
I mean, even if there's still a slight bulge where the nipple would be, that is apparently fine
as long as it's not pink...

[Camera]

can anyone explain to me why it's okay to post completely bare boobs as long as the nipples aren't showing
I mean, even if there's still a slight bulge where the nipple would be, that is apparently fine
as long as it's not pink...

Maybe because it's like showing a bare crotch without the snake.

[Night Fox]

Maybe because it's like showing a bare crotch without the snake.

no, that would be similar to showing a bare chest without boobs

[Kingdaro]

So what would it be for males then?

[Night Fox]

So what would it be for males then?

a snake without a visible head

[Kingdaro]

That's a rather important part of a snake, I'd say, and it'd look a little too weird if that were gone. On the other hand, a boob without a nipple is still pretty clearly a boob.

Then again, it's not really the tip of the snake itself that makes it "incriminating" by today's standards, but I suppose that in itself is the problem here.

[Night Fox]

Then again, it's not really the tip of the snake itself that makes it "incriminating" by today's standards, but I suppose that in itself is the problem here.

quite so

[Aphtonites]

can anyone explain to me why it's okay to post completely bare boobs as long as the nipples aren't showing
I mean, even if there's still a slight bulge where the nipple would be, that is apparently fine
as long as it's not pink...

Because the rules of this forum are broken, that's why.
People have posted what was basically child research in the past and got away with it.

no, that would be similar to showing a bare chest without boobs

So what would it be for males then?

a snake without a visible head

That's a rather important part of a snake, I'd say, and it'd look a little too weird if that were gone. On the other hand, a boob without a nipple is still pretty clearly a boob.

Then again, it's not really the tip of the snake itself that makes it "incriminating" by today's standards, but I suppose that in itself is the problem here.

I can't believe that I'm loving reading this, lol.
Furries sperging about snakees.

brother dose prices are cray

Furries have paid up to thousands of dollars for art in the past, so don't be suprised.
It's just how milking them works.

[Brickman]

Furries have paid up to thousands of dollars for art in the past, so don't be suprised.
It's just how milking them works.

I've gotta see what this art that costs a thousand dollars looks like.

[Kingdaro]

I've gotta see what this art that costs a thousand dollars looks like.

Same, haha.

[Aphtonites]

Same, haha.

I've gotta see what this art that costs a thousand dollars looks like.

Furthermore several pieces of furry art have sold for $5K $5.5K and the most expensive went for $10K. There are plenty of artists who make a living from the fandom. The prices aren't low because of low customer money, they're low because:

A: There's a glut of inexperienced artists who lack the confidence to charge what their work is worth.
B: There's a lot of myths about "selling out" and other stuff flying around spread by people who want to discourage artists from asking for a fair price.

Brokeass fandom my foot, I've seen actual small niches pay six times the money.

They do exist.

[Kingdaro]

Yeah, at most, I'd pay like 20-30 for a nice picture of an anthro fox. Anything above 100 for something like that is just crazy.

But hey, not much of a problem as long as everyone's happy.

* Kingdaro shrugs.

[Brickman]

They do exist.

I wasn't doubting you, I was just curious what a $1000+ furry commission would look like.

[Frontrox]

They do exist.

Yeah I've seen one of redruskers auctions go up to 700+

Not as much as 5k but they do get really pricey