Poll

What is your main sona?

House Cat
71 (7.7%)
Big Cat
25 (2.7%)
General Dog
24 (2.6%)
Wolf
68 (7.3%)
Fox
92 (9.9%)
Snake
5 (0.5%)
Naga
4 (0.4%)
Lizard
8 (0.9%)
Dragon
55 (5.9%)
Horse
5 (0.5%)
Deer
6 (0.6%)
General Bird
17 (1.8%)
Gryphon
11 (1.2%)
Bat
5 (0.5%)
Otter
10 (1.1%)
Rabbit
7 (0.8%)
Frog
3 (0.3%)
Shark
16 (1.7%)
Whale
7 (0.8%)
Raptor
8 (0.9%)
Owl
8 (0.9%)
Goo Creature
22 (2.4%)
Rubber Creature
3 (0.3%)
Latex Creature
31 (3.3%)
Bear
14 (1.5%)
Weasel
3 (0.3%)
Ferret
10 (1.1%)
Sergal
7 (0.8%)
Camel
12 (1.3%)
DeadFur
18 (1.9%)
Human
352 (38%)

Total Members Voted: 923

Author Topic: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here  (Read 5198849 times)

yeah but that doesn't make any sense either
because evolution isn't a thing :/

because evolution isn't a thing :/
no, evolution is a thing, and that is why it doesn't make sense

but, she's a bird, and I'm a man, IT'LL NEVER WORK
bird girls have nice warm feather perfect for cuddling with so it will work

no, evolution is a thing, and that is why it doesn't make sense
it's not completely unfeasible

reptiles and mammals evolved independently, but everything starts somewhere

dragons could've been a mutation involving the genetic materials of both reptiles and mammals, I know they can't mate but something else could have happened

bird girls have nice warm feather perfect for cuddling with so it will work
not as nice as warm soft fur, double perfect for cuddling
dogz & catz rule
dragons could've been a mutation involving the genetic materials of both reptiles and mammals, I know they can't mate but something else could have happened
I'm like, 100% sure nothing like that has ever happened naturally, or even could

dragons are mythical creatures we can do w/e the forget we want with em
don't know why everyone's gettin pissy about a species that doesn't exist in real life therefore has very little anatomical rules if any

feathers are much softer though, and are more cushony if you were to lie on top of them.

what exactly do breasts grant birds to do? like if it does have an advantage it'd wouldn't be limited to females then.


Of course granted they aren't for breast feeding.

I agree, based on two points. Can the edges of a beak seal well enough to allow suckling? I doubt it, but even if so, one probably wouldn't want a beaked mouth suckling at their teats. You'd probably lose a nipple.

@takato&foxswash
Guys guys guys, calm down, look at us complaining about snakees and dragons, like I mean what are we? cigarettes?


why don't we just search up pachyderms instead?

dragons are mythical creatures we can do w/e the forget we want with em
don't know why everyone's gettin pissy about a species that doesn't exist in real life therefore has very little anatomical rules if any
nobody is getting pissy afaik
I agree, based on two points. Can the edges of a beak seal well enough to allow suckling? I doubt it, but even if so, one probably wouldn't want a beaked mouth suckling at their teats. You'd probably lose a nipple.
"BUHCAWK" said momma burd, as baby flatflyer accidentally ripped off one of her teats for like the hundredth time since he hatched. it's a good thing momma burd doesn't have much feeling there anymore


you have to remember bird beaks arent all that sharp or big when they're first born

"BUHCAWK" said momma burd, as baby flatflyer accidentally ripped off one of her teats for like the hundredth time since he hatched. it's a good thing momma burd doesn't have much feeling there anymore
aww that's actually kinda cute

I kinda wish mageflyer was more popular over femtitties
you have to remember bird beaks arent all that sharp or big when they're first born
you'd be surprised how many chicks die of being pecked to death by their brethren



researchomagnum's Cu and Lu...

They're pretty cute, funny, and lewd.

you have to remember bird beaks arent all that sharp or big when they're first born
perfect for su NO

maybe they oughta just have lips on their beaks
I kinda wish mageflyer was more popular over femtitties
what