Poll

What is your main sona?

House Cat
71 (7.7%)
Big Cat
25 (2.7%)
General Dog
24 (2.6%)
Wolf
68 (7.3%)
Fox
92 (9.9%)
Snake
5 (0.5%)
Naga
4 (0.4%)
Lizard
8 (0.9%)
Dragon
55 (5.9%)
Horse
5 (0.5%)
Deer
6 (0.6%)
General Bird
17 (1.8%)
Gryphon
11 (1.2%)
Bat
5 (0.5%)
Otter
10 (1.1%)
Rabbit
7 (0.8%)
Frog
3 (0.3%)
Shark
16 (1.7%)
Whale
7 (0.8%)
Raptor
8 (0.9%)
Owl
8 (0.9%)
Goo Creature
22 (2.4%)
Rubber Creature
3 (0.3%)
Latex Creature
31 (3.3%)
Bear
14 (1.5%)
Weasel
3 (0.3%)
Ferret
10 (1.1%)
Sergal
7 (0.8%)
Camel
12 (1.3%)
DeadFur
18 (1.9%)
Human
352 (38%)

Total Members Voted: 923

Author Topic: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here  (Read 5210280 times)



Silico is a hardened veteran, he's not meant to be a looker. He's a fighter not a man whore, while yes he has his carnal fantasies, he isn't meant for just love and breeding. Same goes for HWG, yes, he is well endowed, but he's pretty skittish about that stuff.

Same goes for HWG, yes, he is well endowed, but he's pretty skittish about that stuff.
Heavy Weapons Guy?


Heavy Weapons Guy?

Well, power knows what it stands for but you guys don't.

HWG-1224 is basically Heavy Weapons Grunt #1224.

He's basically Silico from an alternate timeline that bodyguards for him.


oh yeah about that ehehehe hehaghehfkaghfohkef oieflk,mfa

[im]http://i.imgur.com/4o7cbRp.gif[/img]
How hard is it for you guys to respect my privacy? Stop taking photos, damnit!

What if we really are animals with fur but our eyes perceive us as humans?!

Your argument is flawed by our hitboxes. We do not have a cuadruped hitbox. Our hitboxes are according our shape. If our eyes saw us as furry animals, we would have a problem perceiving the world with our eyes and our sense of touch.

you deserve a commission from me now
you still haven't finished that art trade with me :/

you still haven't finished that art trade with me :/
I need to do this. I just have so little time.

Your argument is flawed by our hitboxes. We do not have a cuadruped hitbox. Our hitboxes are according our shape. If our eyes saw us as furry animals, we would have a problem perceiving the world with our eyes and our sense of touch.
h-hitbox??

Your argument is flawed by our hitboxes. We do not have a cuadruped hitbox. Our hitboxes are according our shape. If our eyes saw us as furry animals, we would have a problem perceiving the world with our eyes and our sense of touch.
I would like to inform you that my coding was never finished and I lack a hitbox

h-hitbox??
On a programmer's point of view, collision is separate code from drawings. If our eyes showed a different shape than our real collision shape, we would be having issues when it comes to perspection when touching, picking up; moving, etc.

On a programmer's point of view, collision is separate code from drawings. If our eyes showed a different shape than our real collision shape, we would be having issues when it comes to perspection when touching, picking up; moving, etc.
i know what a hitbox is
but i dont really. think its the same kind of thing outside games

Well, of course not. In games, the hitbox and drawings are done separately. However, in real life, everything is made out of atoms. Our own eyes see the world how its made by atoms not how our brain says it is. Of course, not everyone's eyes are the same but, if Molten's theory is correct, we would be very forgeted up because we would have different perspections with different senses. We can see, hear, touch, smell and taste. Isolating the senses, we might build up the same image on our head of our surroundings. If the most important senses (commonly being sight and touch) are offset, we would have different perspections on our head. I'm not sure if I'm explaining this clearly.