Lego Movie (2014)

[BlockoBlocko]

Too late cigarettets

[Ad Bot]

[Lalam24]

It's not!

https://twitter.com/chrizmillr/status/341968821730549760

"LIVE ACTION SHOOT"


Also:

You're loving stupid.  This film has been in production for 4 years already, and you believe that the entire thing was made in 5 days?  Because if you want to base all of your information on that twitter message, that's what you're implying.

The movie has SOME stop motion, however the majority of the film is CG. (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lego_Movie#Production "Australian Animal Logic will provide the animation, which is expected to comprise 80% of the film. ")

It's much more efficient to make a film that adapts to the frame cutting of a stop motion than it is to produce a real stop motion.  And, trust me, if it were a real stop motion, those gaps would be far from as noticable as they are in the trailer -- this is far from a small budget.

You don't really know much about cinematography OR the film we're discussing, so quit spouting information which is based on your childish speculation.

And, on that note, if you actually think the random lego pictures have anything to do with the film's production, you're really loving stupid.

[Cookiez664]

I wanna watch dis yo

[Nonnel]

I can tell just by looking she's gonna be "that girl". Too many movies I've seen always have "that girl", who always schools all the guys (who are often mostly buffoons), is smarter than them, and looks good doing it.

Marlo Thomas???

[Tetris]

You're loving stupid.  This film has been in production for 4 years already, and you believe that the entire thing was made in 5 days?  Because if you want to base all of your information on that twitter message, that's what you're implying.

The movie has SOME stop motion, however the majority of the film is CG. (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lego_Movie#Production "Australian Animal Logic will provide the animation, which is expected to comprise 80% of the film. ")

It's much more efficient to make a film that adapts to the frame cutting of a stop motion than it is to produce a real stop motion.  And, trust me, if it were a real stop motion, those gaps would be far from as noticable as they are in the trailer -- this is far from a small budget.

You don't really know much about cinematography OR the film we're discussing, so quit spouting information which is based on your childish speculation.

And, on that note, if you actually think the random lego pictures have anything to do with the film's production, you're really loving stupid.

Calm your tits

It's a movie

[Lalam24]

Calm your tits

It's a movie

Quit prancing around on your high horse trying to correct people when you're dead wrong.

[Katadeus]

What I want to see is any and all concept art and/or storyboard sketches etc.

and redrawn stills etc.

[Tetris]

Quit prancing around on your high horse trying to correct people when you're dead wrong.

And I will

Now shhhh calm yourself

[ShadowsfeaR]

Quit prancing around on your high horse trying to correct people when you're dead wrong.

No you should calm the forget down too.

[Skull Candy]

Quit prancing around on your high horse trying to correct people when you're dead wrong.

Calm down.

[Dr.Block]

Quit prancing around on your high horse trying to correct people when you're dead wrong.

Why does every compelling and reasonable argument need to end in insults? Your point was solid and you had me on board until you threw in "you're really loving stupid." It just makes you look like you're not even sure what you're talking about because your post should be able to stand it's own ground without the use of loving or stupid.

[Tayasaurus]

Lalam is destructively correct though.

[Alteration]

Lalam is destructively correct though.

It's ok to be correct.
It's not ok to be a complete richard about it and belittle somebody in every way for being wrong.

[Lalam24]

Why does every compelling and reasonable argument need to end in insults? Your point was solid and you had me on board until you threw in "you're really loving stupid." It just makes you look like you're not even sure what you're talking about because your post should be able to stand it's own ground without the use of loving or stupid.

Profanities aren't implicit of inadequate arguments.

Ad hominem isn't, either.

It's ok to be correct.
It's not ok to be a complete richard about it and belittle somebody in every way for being wrong.

In retaliation to him constantly boasting his speculated knowledge as if it were true, I'd say my insulting has done just as much harm as his misinformation.

I can agree that the way in which I acted was a bit immature, but this doesn't imply the opposing view is being prompted by an angel, and that I'm the only figure here displaying an insultive attitude (which, by the way, is perception based).

[Tetris]

I understand that I was wrong and he was right

but all the cursing and putting me down is reaaallly not necessary