Nations at War

[blazerblock2]

Seeing the obviously advance tanks, infantry are supplied anti-tank rifles. 

As for the assault rifles, I don't see how having a rifle that's new makes it automatically superior.  The M16 was new, but the AK was still superior.

[Ad Bot]

[Gojira]

The counter offensive is met with multiple ambushes, thinning down the forces that the BFSSR has to deal with.

[Mikoyan]

The M16 was new, but the AK was still superior.

Uhhhhhhhh Except you have mosin nagants against Ak-47s... yeah

[blazerblock2]

As well as SVT-40s, RP-46s, and PPSh-41s, all of which are 7.62 firearms.

[Mikoyan]

Ok if you think any of those are superior to the Ak you're just being really stupid

[blazerblock2]

I'm not, but it's not really even the weapon, it's the person using it.  For you to say you won is also powergame.

[Mikoyan]

no my soviet soldiers would be way better trained than some muslim terrorist ragheads sorry

[blazerblock2]

no my soviet soldiers would be way better trained than some muslim terrorist ragheads sorry

uh
no.

[Mikoyan]

yeah...




tell me who's better

[blazerblock2]

These are not Abdullahian sodiers.

This is an Abdullahian soldier.

Stop being stupid.

[Mikoyan]

you're a third world country how do you afford that stuff??

[blazerblock2]

... We're not a third world country?

[Mikoyan]

*Currency in comparison to Euros: 1 Shilling = 0.01 Euro

klol

[blazerblock2]

Just because the currency isn't worth much compared to the Euro doesn't make the country third-world.  It means there's just been a lot of money printed.

[Mikoyan]

which means you have an extremely unstable economy which means you shouldn't even be fighting wars