Poll

Hoo-rah!

45 (23.2%)
22 (11.3%)
22 (11.3%)
20 (10.3%)
85 (43.8%)

Total Members Voted: 194

Author Topic: DOMA WAS RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL  (Read 21426 times)

I think it's only fair I put my two cents in. There are always going to be Homoloveual people and since they are people too they will eventually get rights like should have had in the first place (At least I hope they get rights)  just because your holy book says no to that stuff doesn't mean you need to hate them. If they get married, it doesn't affect you or your life. This country was built on keeping Chruch and State separate so your book means jack in this situation. Just my two cents.
Why don't we just burn every religious person along with their stupid religious bullstuff?
INB4PEOPLEDONTGETSARCASM

And they are pretty much entirely rural farmers.

and therefore the system is functioning entirely as intended

the whole point of the senate and the house having different election methods and different membership levels was to balance out the difference in representation of low-population and high-population states and to balance out urban and rural populations, but getting rid of mechanisms and making the senate more like the house only gears it towards majority rule

and therefore the system is functioning entirely as intended

the whole point of the senate and the house having different election methods and different membership levels was to balance out the difference in representation of low-population and high-population states and to balance out urban and rural populations, but getting rid of mechanisms and making the senate more like the house only gears it towards majority rule
Except the senators are still voted in by a majority in the state, and they always have been, whether it was through the proxy of state elected legislators or not.

what are you even talking about

freedom of religion has exactly 0 to do with political or ethnic minorities
You have no idea about what you're talking about. See Headcrab's post.

INB4PEOPLEDONTGETSARCASM


seriously though sarcasm cannot be conveyed well on the internet, are people supposed to read your mind?

You have no idea about what you're talking about. See Headcrab's post.

you are making 0 sense and i feel like you're almost in another conversation entirely

Except the senators are still voted in by a majority in the state, and they always have been, whether it was through the proxy of state elected legislators or not.

indirect election means that there is a greater chance that you don't get solid one-party senator lineups


indirect election means that there is a greater chance that you don't get solid one-party senator lineups
Not really because the people who elect the senators indirectly are those who were elected directly.


Someone give me 1 good objective reason not involving religion, to deny LGBT's ANY rights that the straight majority has. all people should get equal rights no matter what. That includes religion, personal opinion, and any form of majority/minority rules system.


And people didn't like the thought of white people marrying black people. Get over it  :cookieMonster:
Wait are you telling me to get over it or?
Because I said it was fine if they can marry or not.
I mean, I could care less.

it's gross
So you're willing to take away rights of other good, hard-working human beings in a country that boasts about its rights and equality

because YOU find it "gross"


So you're willing to take away rights of other good, hard-working human beings in a country that boasts about its rights and equality

because YOU find it "gross"

I think it's blatantly obvious he's joking.