Great, Canada wants to filter out research too.

[ABlockOfCheese]

4chan.

[Ad Bot]

[Funkadelic]

Let's just hope this doesn't happen in merica k

[Blockzillahead]

Let's just hope this doesn't happen in merica k

2 late obama wants to stop u from looking at dirty people

[Dodger]

Why filter it out anyway? What's so bad about love? Is love the devil's sport or something? Should we never do it and stop existing?

Yes, but why stop kids from seeing it anyway? It's not like they'll turn into a loveual maniac who will rape everyone.

I hope you aren't ever a parent. Kids internalize stuff a lot when they're young, and showing them research which portrays loveual relations in a fantasized and bullstuff fashion at that phase in life isn't good for a child's later development. I wouldn't be surprised if you were 15 or younger.

[King of the Bill]

I hope you aren't ever a parent. Kids internalize stuff a lot when they're young, and showing them research which portrays loveual relations in a fantasized and bullstuff fashion at that phase in life isn't good for a child's later development. I wouldn't be surprised if you were 15 or younger.

I agree with this.
However, censoring everyone is the wrong solution.

Once they have the ability to filter research it's a lot easier to filter anything they want to. It's a lot easier to pass censorship laws if you say "Think of the children!!" first.

Basically this. You don't censor the loving internet.

[Bisjac]

its not censoring at all. not even remotly.

i dont see you guys crying over censorship because you cant go to a rated r movie. its the exact same thing.

[Dodger]

I agree with this.
However, censoring everyone is the wrong solution.

I agree that a parent should have the right to control their kids internet usage, government however is unnecessary and stupid and very infringing on civil liberties

[Bisjac]

I agree that a parent should have the right to control their kids internet usage, government however is unnecessary and stupid and very infringing on civil liberties

this IS an example of parents controlling their kids internet usage.
if a parent dosnt give a forget, they can allow research in the house for the kid. its that simple.

[Tetris]

there will always be magazines

[Tayasaurus]

there will always be magazines

And plenty of ammo! 

[Nonnel]

britain pretty much controls canada so this was bound to happen

[Blockzillahead]

I hope you aren't ever a parent. Kids internalize stuff a lot when they're young, and showing them research which portrays loveual relations in a fantasized and bullstuff fashion at that phase in life isn't good for a child's later development. I wouldn't be surprised if you were 15 or younger.

Obviously I will not let them watch it if they are really young. Around the age of 13-18 they are fine.

And I'm lucky because I'm 16 not 15, I win by 1 number.

[Kalphiter²]

I agree that a parent should have the right to control their kids internet usage, government however is unnecessary and stupid and very infringing on civil liberties

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?

[Dodger]

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?

Geez I guess parents don't mean crap anymore do they? I guess those children need a Big Brother to watch out for their healthy development.

[Blockzillahead]

Geez I guess parents don't mean crap anymore do they? I guess those children need a Big Brother to watch out for their healthy development.

Yes we need Big Brother to babysit all of us.