Author Topic: [Forum Petition] Make the "Do not flame" rule more descriptive  (Read 4940 times)

Well, I guess my point is moot, then. If he didn't learn his lesson, the he deserves to be perma'd.

i cant make a single god damn thread without people saying "maroon and his band of idiots"
or something similar.
maybe because thats always the case

Actually, I support this, insomuch that a perma for what appears to be "minor flaming" is a bit overkill.
A few days ago I also apparently managed to get Dezcaban/RaR banned for a week over a joke image with mspaint level gore that I was too dense to recognize as a joke. Looking back, I honestly wonder if it was actually bannable.
Someone else in the thread did imply that they reported it also, but... Still. I actually wish I hadn't reported it, as it really didn't manage much in the way of gore (or flaming)

I agree on the wolf pack mentality. Kaiiu's ban was for dontcaredontpost I thought, but still. I said to the OP of that "SOMEONE CUSSES" topic "forget you, OP, get banned". (The forget you was a joke related to "no cussing"). Nobody reported me or anyone else who told him to get banned.

I wonder if the flaming rule doesn't apply if they actually are very very obviously stupid?

I do not support this.

When you post, you should know exactly what you're posting before you post it. You should have a pretty good idea if you're flaming or not based on your intentions in the post.

Theres really no need to be a richard anyways.

forum petitions never work, and they probably never will

oh my loving god im not standing up for blockguy im just proving a point

i cant make a single god damn thread without people saying "maroon and his band of idiots"
or something similar.
I don't get why people are responding this way. You have a point and you were not trying to defend blockguy in any way.

I do not support this.

When you post, you should know exactly what you're posting before you post it. You should have a pretty good idea if you're flaming or not based on your intentions in the post.

Theres really no need to be a richard anyways.
"wow this guy posted nudity!"
"okay i reported him and after people report something they usually say "get banned" so i guess ill say that"

you were banned: flaming

"why was i banned? what did i do?, i looked i what i was posting and i knew what i was posting why was i banned for flaming?"

"wow this guy posted nudity!"
"okay i reported him and after people report something they usually say "get banned" so i guess ill say that"

you were banned: flaming

"why was i banned? what did i do?, i looked i what i was posting and i knew what i was posting why was i banned for flaming?"
you don't need to say "get banned" or as block guy said "get loving banned"

Just report and move on.

"wow this guy posted nudity!"
"okay i reported him and after people report something they usually say "get banned" so i guess ill say that"
you were banned: flaming
"why was i banned? what did i do?, i looked i what i was posting and i knew what i was posting why was i banned for flaming?"
tunnel vision at it's finest, ladies and gentlemen

tunnel vision at it's finest, ladies and gentlemen
honestly taboo i don't even know what you're getting at anymore

honestly taboo i don't even know what you're getting at anymore
that's probably got something to do with the aforementioned tunnel vision

A hate how the community instantly turns down any suggestions regarding the forums. All the OP was asking for is clarification on a particular rule.
Nothing more. Nothing less.

/support

honestly taboo i don't even know what you're getting at anymore





blockzillahead you've been a handicap many times in the past i don't think you should be talking.