Poll

well?

heteroloveual
213 (68.9%)
homoloveual
28 (9.1%)
biloveual
35 (11.3%)
panloveaul
12 (3.9%)
polyloveual
3 (1%)
aloveual
10 (3.2%)
zoophilia
8 (2.6%)

Total Members Voted: 309

Author Topic: Poll - loveual orientation  (Read 20866 times)

lol @ all the buzzword orientations made up to sound cool
lol @ all the biloveuals who will say they were just experimenting in a few years when the angst wears off
They weren't "just made up to sound cool". They actually mean something, you know, and there are more of them than listed in the poll.

They weren't "just made up to sound cool". They actually mean something, you know, and there are more of them than listed in the poll.
this

also zoophilia isn't a loveual orientation it's just a philia

also zoophilia isn't a loveual orientation it's just a philia


is it really hard to believe that somebody can be attracted to multiple/all combinations of biological gender + gender identity?
It's called biloveual.
You can say the terms demiloveual panloveual omniloveual and polyloveual mean something different from biloveual, but they really don't.
The problem here is there are people who deny the idea of a gender binary. There are two genders, and only two, and the word gender means the same as the word love. (save for the act of love)

Anything to the contray is splitting hairs and making up neologisms to sound origional.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2013, 09:42:52 PM by DrenDran »

loling hard at "aloveuals"

Panloveual and don't care to defend whether or not it's "different" from biloveuality.

It's called biloveual.
You can say the terms demiloveual panloveual omniloveual and polyloveual mean something different from biloveual, but they really don't.
The problem here is there are people who deny the idea of a gender binary. There are two genders, and only two, and the word gender means the same as the word love. (save for the act of love)

Anything to the contray is splitting hairs and making up neologisms to sound origional.
except they do. not every conforms to your ideas of gender. sorry.

think of it this way: if the idea of a gender binary is 100% correct, when the idea of somebody not being cisgendered/heteroloveual isn't surprising, and the "edginess" of these labels fades, we'll discover whether people are still claiming to be panloveual, omniloveual, demiloveual, polyloveual, etc. if they are still doing so, then it's a legitimate thing. if not, then i guess it just was attention seekers. there's no way to know. but it's better to accommodate for a few possible attention seekers than to shun a group of people with a legitimate orientation.
loling hard at "aloveuals"
what's so surprising about aloveuality? what is there to be gained from pretending you have no loveual attraction?
It's unlikely that 28% of people in a poll put anything other than Heteroloveual.
given the sample size, and that it's the internet, i'm not surprised it's 28%.

if they are still doing so, then it's a legitimate thing.
Not how it works.
There's richard, and there's vagina.
You can't "feel" your way into a third gender.
For forgets sake, I don't have anything agains homoloveuals, but you people and your "identies" and "identification" are loving pedantic.

DrenDran, weren't you like 12 last time I was here?

DrenDran, weren't you like 12 last time I was here?
No? I'm 18 and a half.
You haven't been here for a while, but if I do recall you didn't like me.

Not how it works.
There's richard, and there's vagina.
You can't "feel" your way into a third gender.
For forgets sake, I don't have anything agains homoloveuals, but you people and your "identies" and "identification" are loving pedantic.
what the forget are you on about? i'm talking about the legitimacy of the terms you provided. the logic can be applied to gender identity too however; once claiming different gender identities isn't something attention can be gained from anymore, we will see whether their claims have any legitimacy based on the numbers; how many unique people claimed to be genderqueer this year? based on the statistic, we can confirm whether it was some sort of fad or a legitimate claim. like i said, it'd be better to risk accommodating a few attention seekers than risk prosecuting a group of people.

No? I'm 18 and a half.
You haven't been here for a while, but if I do recall you didn't like me.
Given your posts in this topic, I can believe that I didn't like you. :P

what the forget are you on about? i'm talking about the legitimacy of the terms you provided. the logic can be applied to gender identity too however; once claiming different gender identities isn't something attention can be gained from anymore, we will see whether their claims have any legitimacy based on the numbers; how many unique people claimed to be genderqueer this year? based on the statistic, we can confirm whether it was some sort of fad or a legitimate claim. like i said, it'd be better to risk accommodating a few attention seekers than risk prosecuting a group of people.
I don't think you understand the fact that a term's validity doesn't actually depend on what people do at all. If me and a large percent of the world started calling ourselves "blockoloveual" that wouldn't instantly give the term any meaning.
I can't actually tell if you agree with me or not that there's only two genders, male and female.
Given your posts in this topic, I can believe that I didn't like you. :P
:cookieMonster:

Given your posts in this topic, I can believe that I didn't like you. :P