Poll - loveual orientation

[RaR]

so is overpopulation, you should be thanking homoloveuals

yeah but being homoloveual doesn't mean you can't raise kids lol.

[Ad Bot]

[Night Fox]

yeah but being homoloveual doesn't mean you can't raise kids lol.

it means you can't create them, unless you get a surrogate mother or something. but in general homoloveual couples do not have children. they might adopt them or something, but they don't usually contribute to population growth

[RaR]

yeah but the difference is so minimal it's almost non-existent. for every homoloveual couple that dies out a heteroloveual couple creates two above the average.

[Themosticles]

please be honest

But yet 9 people put zoophilia... including me (My name is Feline in-game)

[PitDeggeh²]

All you do is link stuff.
That doesn't confirm what you're linking is factual at all.

I could link a thousand sources saying that biloveuality and homoloveuality are just fads and aren't natural.

Truth is, no one really knows for sure. I believe it's a fad personally, and I don't like it. It's one of societies current problems.

It's better to link studies and topics on it rather than go off wild-speculation and opinion, and unlike you I read up heavily on the subject before I open my mouth.

Would you rather I pull arguments out of my ass rather than link sources? Oh of course you'd like it; It's just like you afterall.

[Nuclear Hazard]

Heteroloveuality: 69.2%

[Nuclear Hazard]

Where is the furry option???

zoophilia

[Nal]

zoophilia

since when is being a furry zoophilia

[Nuclear Hazard]

cigarette·got 
/ˈcigaretteət/
Noun
A small or large bundle of sticks*

Well...
Uh..
Yeah?  Lmao.  Even though 99.99% of the usage of the term is derogative doesn't mean it doesn't have a real meaning.

[Nuclear Hazard]

since when is being a furry zoophilia

loveUAL ORIENTATION

[Nal]

have you heard of something called editing a post?

[RedGajin]

i dont think calling yourself a chick and dressing like a chick makes you a chick, and if you like dudes youre still gay af. if you forget a chick with a richard youre still gay, or a dude with a vagina. same goes for chicks. call that a different loveuality if you like but youre still loving your own gender.

[Pandan]

It's better to link studies and topics on it rather than go off wild-speculation and opinion, and unlike you I read up heavily on the subject before I open my mouth.

Would you rather I pull arguments out of my ass rather than link sources? Oh of course you'd like it; It's just like you afterall.

I haven't had a great smirk on my face in awhile, thank you.

I'm sure you read very heavily on it.

You deny that research on homoloveuality isn't inconclusive? Because it is. All your sources are bias. Most sources have a bias.
And having a source battle doesn't prove anything but how handicapped you look.

The argument on whether anyone is "fine" with homoloveuality has little to do with science. Because the scientific evidence reflects our study on nature.
Homoloveuality is not productive. And therefore, useless.

I don't take anything a furry says with the least bit seriousness anyways. But thanks for your input.

[Pandan]

i dont think calling yourself a chick and dressing like a chick makes you a chick, and if you like dudes youre still gay af. if you forget a chick with a richard youre still gay, or a dude with a vagina. same goes for chicks. call that a different loveuality if you like but youre still loving your own gender.

I'm completely blown away by this response. And I'm fail to understand your point completely.

You're basically starting an argument on what a "gender" really is.
And that argument never ends. I wish you luck.

[IcePlanetAstronaut]

Are we now acting like zoophilia is a normal thing?...

Oh.