It seems that there is more drama about my banner than the actual person I've posted about. The reason I have made a topic about Siba is because he is banning super admins for doing their job (fixing up maps, keeping players from teaming; to make the game more fun for others.) Then banning anyone who questions his actions, using them of siding with the super admins. Now lets go OVER siba's data and actions.
"fixing up maps", destroying parts of the map is not fixing them, getting Zapk to upload a new version of the save with changes made to them is fixing them, destroying parts of the map disrupts the gameplay.
"keeping players from teaming" this is not against the rules, and Zeblote's way of taking care of this 'problem' consisted of calling the player a noob and making fun of him along with others.
Zapk appears to agree with me on everything above.
He ban me with the reason: Treating players like stuff, constant stuff talking, joining in with Zeblote's treatment of players.
Firstly I'd like to know what players I treated like stuff, all I did was question Siba's actions to banning Zeblote.
Secondly I was confused as to what "stuff talking" is, that's why I asked Siba in the IRC chat, he is referring to me
using Twitter talk (@'s and #'s all the time) as a joke, (everyone on the server was aware it was a joke, maybe not Siba though)
he classed this as spam. It obviously wasn't spam, since I wasn't spamming it into the chat bar every three seconds. However in fairness, if Siba believed that this was actually spam, then fair enough (this is the only thing I can side with Siba on.)
Thirdly, I have no clue whatsoever as to what "joining in with Zeblote's treatment of players." is all about. All I did was question Siba's actions to banning Zeblote. I have no clue who this Giddyspace011 person is, (why I said "who is giddy?" in the IRC chat) I don't believe I ever saw him on the server, and if him and Zeblote did argue, then it would have been something that happened before I arrived. So this is another invalid accusation that Siba has thrown at me.
[17:24:01] [L]: Who's giddy?
[17:24:43] [L]: We'll see what Zapk has to see about this, regardless.
[17:25:36] [L]: Zapk worked too hard on the server to have stuffheads like you go and ruin it
[17:25:49] siba: "Was [L] in on treating giddy like stuff."
[17:25:53] siba: "oh no he wasnt"
[17:25:57] siba: "he was the one spamming hash tag stuff"
[17:26:03] siba: Your ban time has been reduced to one day.
[17:26:09] [L]: Who are you even quoting?
[17:27:38] [L]: what do you think Zapk thinks of you?
[17:28:05] siba: What does it matter?
[17:28:11] siba: I'm trying to do my best here.
[17:28:42] siba: Zeblote was treating giddy like stuff, Datablock allegedly was as well, oddity and you were spamming hashtag stuff.
[17:28:55] [L]: Banning players without a warning, and banning super admins for no reason is against admin rules
[17:29:15] siba: I banned him for perfectly valid loving reasons.
[17:29:15] [L]: The wisest thing for you to do now, so you don't get into even more trouble would to be unban Zeblote and me
[17:29:26] siba: Every single reason I placed in his ban reason, he commited.
[17:29:51] siba: I'm reducing your ban to a single day, possibly even less for the spam.
[17:29:52] [L]: That DOESNT MATTER
[17:29:55] siba: It was near constant.
[17:30:06] [L]: You need to give warnings for maybe me, fair enough if that was spam
[17:30:07] siba: L I don't have a guideline to follow here.
I admit here it was a mistake to ban you for both the time and reasons stated because of how much stuff I was dealing with at once.
You seem to acknowledge it, yet you put up the argument again as if you have no idea why I did so and I just won't tell you anything.
Finally, Siba accuses me of "scaring off" players for using my Twitter talk in the server:
[17:41:47] siba: I don't consider spamming up the server a joke.
[17:42:11] siba: You bring down the quality of the server by doing so, scaring off players who don't care to listen to your 'joke'.
[17:42:28] [L]: What players did I "scare"?
[17:42:56] [L]: You bring down the quality of servers by banning people you dislike .
[17:43:07] siba: I didn't ban you because I dislike you.
[17:43:17] [L]: Siba just tell me, who did I "scare" off
[17:43:19] siba: I banned you at first for spamming, and joining in on Zeblote's stuff.
[17:43:31] siba: Until the player I am talking to corrected that.
[17:43:37] siba: I rebanned you for a day for the spam.
[17:43:38] [L]: Who did I scare off
[17:43:51] siba: You don't need to scare off a player at that very moment.
[17:43:57] [L]: Siba...
[17:43:59] [L]: who
[17:44:00] [L]: did
[17:44:01] [L]: I
[17:44:02] [L]: scare
[17:44:02] [L]: off
[17:44:08] siba: You keep the population of the server down when you spam the server.
[17:44:12] siba: Less people stick around.
[17:44:14] [L]: Siba
[17:44:31] [L]: Most on the server were in on my twitter jokes, now who did I scare off
[17:44:57] siba: I couldn't give less of a stuff, you bring the quality down for the players that do not.
[17:45:08] siba: Which is the players we want to attract.
[17:45:15] siba: Not someone who is going to join in on the spam WITH you.
[17:45:15] [L]: Siba will you answer my question
[17:45:22] [L]: siba
[17:45:29] siba: I answered your loving questions.
[17:45:32] siba: Every one of them.
[17:45:34] siba: Goodbye.
[17:45:36] * You have blocked [L].
Obviously that sounds like complete bullstuff, what I can make out of this is that Siba thinks I ended up making people leave the server because of how annoying I am. When I asked him who I "scared off" he completely avoids the question as you can see above, I have to ask him several times until I can get an answer out of him. When I do get an answer out of him he says "Every one of them." Is this meant to mean I "scared off" every player on the server? I don't even need to tell you all how ridiculous that is. I would have questioned Siba about that, however he left the conversation when he realized what he said was hilariously dumb.
A player spamming a popular server will drain that server of players easily if an admin does not step in, I told you to stop spamming at one point in the server and you simply said it was not spam and continued.
You don't have to mash your keyboard for something to be counted as spam.
