Maybe you shouldn't jump to conclusions? Maybe you shouldn't persecute without full knowledge? Maybe you should at least learn someone's gender before you explain to them why they're an awful human being. :3
I jumped to conclusions because of your ambiguous, poor wording. I called you a sociopath, which is technically a diagnosis, not a persecution. I didn't ask your gender because it's not loving relevant you mongoloid.
Furthermore, just because English does not have a gender-neutral pronoun does not mean that there aren't conventions for which one you use. For centuries, the pronoun 'he' has been the default, regardless of how 'patriarchal' and 'oppressive' the word is. You list your gender as '____' in your profile, which gives me the option of wasting my incredibly valuable time asking you some trite, meaningless question that isn't relevant to our discussion, or resorting to using 'he' instead. I choose the latter.
Forgot to respond to this. Not quite. I just grabbed a quick google, but if memory serves it has to do with whether they're born with it versus something causing it later in life.
Congratulations, you managed to nit-pick my argument based on obscure epidemiological facts. Yes, you're right. There's a difference, but in this context it's the same stuff.