...true followers of Jesus Christ do not...
I often like reading pro-religion arguments just to see how long the argument goes without resorting to a logical fallacy. Congratulations,
you whoever wrote this
couldn't make it past the first paragraph1) Christians in a representative democracy have as much right to be involved in the political process as anyone else. This means they may vote, rally, lobby, caucus, and hold office just like any other American—all the while promoting laws that reflect their own values. Christians do not seek to subvert the political process; they engage it, as it is the right of every American.
While they may have the
legal right to vote based off their religious views, I do not believe voting based solely off a religious view that affects other outside of your religion is ethical.
If they don't believe same-love couples should get married, then they simply don't marry someone of the same love.
If they don't believe babies should be aborted, then they simply don't abort their babies.
Some say that it is wrong to try to “legislate morality.” We say that it is impossible not to.
The problem here is that the concept of "morality" is
extremely subjective.
The example used here is that it is wrong to kill someone, but even that is subjective: is killing someone for self defense wrong? Some people say yes, some people say no. Is killing someone through capital punishment wrong? Again some people say yes, some people say no.
A lot of pro-religion arguments seem like they're more oriented towards reassuring believers that they're doing the right thing, than to actually pose an argument towards a non-believer