Clearing up some things

[Lalam24]

Eh, I don't think that's really the same thing. The lung change just seems like a body's response to thin air, to be born with stronger lungs would be like being born with stronger muscles because your parents worked out a lot. It doesn't work that way

I think we're at an impass then.  Oh well, good while it lasted.  Thanks for participating man.

[Ad Bot]

[Mysteroo]

I think we're at an impass then.  Oh well, good while it lasted.  Thanks for participating man.

Thanks for having a civil conversation- Whenever I try to get into one of these conversations here it seems to always end up being a rip roaring insult fight. lol

[Bloody Mary]

Then you haven't been reading it right.  Yes, I posted this on /pol/.  For the third time, the OP posted an argument VERBATIM which was posted about a year ago on this forum by me, and didn't exist before then.  Assuming we're both plagiarizing each other instead of assuming we're the same person doesn't make much sense.

Wait, the argument contained in this thread has been posted by you before? I ran some cursory searches and found nothing. Could you give me a link to the thread?

[Alternat¡ve]

op wants an intellectual debate

and he heads to blockland forums

[Lalam24]

Wait, the argument contained in this thread has been posted by you before? I ran some cursory searches and found nothing. Could you give me a link to the thread?

No, the argument posted by the OP as his first counterargument, the third-fifth posts in the /pol/ topic, only existed when I posted them in other topics months/about a year ago on the blockland forum.

Take an excerpt that doesn't contain quotes because you'll just get a mess of things relating to biblical information, throw it into google with quotes (I'm sure you know that), and you'll come up with
Link pagestretch, just google
"Now, the problem here is that we know for an absolute fact that the earth is not stationary, and that it is not the center of the universe. Under the argument that the Bible was written by several individuals under the word of god, and could've simply been misconceived by these individuals, then there is still a very blatant error to address: If there is ANY room for error in the book, then it has 0 credibility, not only in reference to my previously stated argument suggestion perfection as the only reason for credibility in the Bible, but also because the entire document can be one giant misconception."

[Bloody Mary]

No, the argument posted by the OP as his first counterargument, the third-fifth posts in the /pol/ topic, only existed when I posted them in other topics months/about a year ago on the blockland forum.
Take an excerpt that doesn't contain quotes because you'll just get a mess of things relating to biblical information, throw it into google with quotes (I'm sure you know that), and you'll come up with
Link pagestretch, just google
"Now, the problem here is that we know for an absolute fact that the earth is not stationary, and that it is not the center of the universe. Under the argument that the Bible was written by several individuals under the word of god, and could've simply been misconceived by these individuals, then there is still a very blatant error to address: If there is ANY room for error in the book, then it has 0 credibility, not only in reference to my previously stated argument suggestion perfection as the only reason for credibility in the Bible, but also because the entire document can be one giant misconception."

So why did you include deliberate call outs to things like Judaism which /pol/ hates but the blockland forums do not? I quote: "Constantly slamming judaism because you're under the impression all jewish individuals are out to harm you is not only based on nonexistent statistic, but paranoia prompted by.. well, stupidity." Why even bother including that sentence? I have never seen anyone on these forums "constantly slamming judaism" as you seem to argue.

[Katadeus]

Thanks for posting this
I do like to see logical argument.

[DiceyGrammar]

No, I was expecting an intellectual debate topic. 

[Blockzillahead]

op wants an intellectual debate

and he heads to blockland forums

You are indirectly insulting your intellect.

[Menen]

Variables based on logic and their improper use to equal something that cannot exist.  Being under the impression that x+x=0 while assuming x=1

Again. How is that even math.

Thats like saying Seed+Water=Plant is math. That isn't math, that's gardening. Its a logical error and there isn't any math involved

[DiceyGrammar]

Again. How is that even math.

Thats like saying Seed+Water=Plant is math. That isn't math, that's gardening. Its a logical error and there isn't any math involved

cmon man, dont interrupt his armchair philosophy, he was going so well!

[Lalam24]

So why did you include deliberate call outs to things like Judaism which /pol/ hates but the blockland forums do not? I quote: "Constantly slamming judaism because you're under the impression all jewish individuals are out to harm you is not only based on nonexistent statistic, but paranoia prompted by.. well, stupidity." Why even bother including that sentence? I have never seen anyone on these forums "constantly slamming judaism" as you seem to argue.

It was a reference to general hatred of other religious preferences.

Again. How is that even math.

Thats like saying Seed+Water=Plant is math. That isn't math, that's gardening. Its a logical error and there isn't any math involved

No, it's not.  Mathematically incorrect variables defining a situation are based on the actual principles and why their existence or following is impossible/unreasonable.  You keep asking how it's math, but I've already answered the question and given you an example.  You gave a counterexample that would also imply mathematics, but wouldn't be used in the same situation as there are many more variables involved.  Essentially, though, you cannot say that plant+seed=water --  similarly, you cannot saying monotheism - polytheism = positive variable, specifically when you add in that the monotheistic ideals are based on the polytheistic ideals.