Author Topic: Do you have a religion?  (Read 12370 times)

i think that was a morman thing. (technically mormans consider themselves chrsitian)

the bible itself was written by and for dark skinned people. not necessarily black, but i dont think they had that issue in those areas. since the only white influence were invaders from the north. the ones that didnt have anything to do with the bible/torah

*Mormon

Well of course we're Christian, we believe in Christ and what he did for us. We didn't allow blacks to hold the priesthood for a while (but still allowed them to be part of the church) on account of their unfortunate history, not because we didn't particularly like them.

EDIT: Never mind, I don't know what I'm talking about. Still learning.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2013, 02:37:13 PM by Admiral Obvious »

No, it's a train wreck because atheist asswipes like you come in here and discount every religion that someone brings up.

are you loving kidding me

to be honest, I have trouble believing in something after death other than rebirth
Think about it, some believe death as sleeping and never waking up. well imagine waking up without never having slept. That's what it's like with birth
idk man

No, it's a train wreck because atheist asswipes like you come in here and discount every religion that someone brings up.
muslim, you call lots of people edgy yet your one of the edgiest people here.
see the problem.

muslim, you call lots of people edgy yet your one of the edgiest people here.
see the problem.
muslim's a known idiot though

so is the hat implying im a hipster for not being game to religion?

hipsters do/dont do things because they are trendy or ironic. not because of beliefs.

muslim's a known idiot though
well to me he was fine at first, just a little dumb;
but now...

« Last Edit: November 17, 2013, 03:39:34 PM by Gatysh »

Agnostic-Atheist
wot

you can't be neutral-side

you have to be neutral-neutral for it to be neutral

on account of their unfortunate history, not because we didn't particularly like them.
the forget

wot

you can't be neutral-side

you have to be neutral-neutral for it to be neutral
No stuff? It implies "There probably isn't a god, but there's still the small chance of one existing."

....that's agnosticism
i see you have no idea what you're talking about

....that's agnosticism
i see you have no idea what you're talking about
I thought agnosticism was 50/50 (exists/not), not 25/75.
I stand corrected and I'll see my way out of this thread.

to be honest, I have trouble believing in something after death other than rebirth
Think about it, some believe death as sleeping and never waking up. well imagine waking up without never having slept. That's what it's like with birth
idk man
I personally find rebirth to be a poor explanation or atleast entirely un-verifiable.
People aren't born with knowledge of a past life, and personalities can be formed through experience, so they aren't entirely created at birth. So its difficult to say that a soul can be reborn.
Bodies will always be different too. Similarities exist, but there are always changes, like finger or tongue prints (bar in identical twins, but you can't be resurrected into the body of your twin who is being born alongside you). So if bodies aren't reborn and neither are souls (minds) then how can you possibly claim that you as an individual have been reborn? That's certainly not life after death, but rather an entirely new life unconnected to a previous death.

Personally I find theistic resurrection to be more viable than rebirth. At the very least it can be verified eschatologically, through death. If I die and am later resurrected with my soul and/or body, then I can verify resurrection through my own experience of it. If I have no previous memory nor the same body when reborn or reincarnated, then how can I verify I am a person who has previously died,  and found life after death?
So atleast the concept of resurrection or even the immortality of the soul (the soul living on after death) could be subject to eschatological verification through me dying and then seeing whether or not I am resurrected or if my soul lives on.

For my actual views however I would consider myself a materialist and of the view that I die entirely, body and soul, at death.
I might in some essence live on in memories or legacies or through the continuation of my genes, but neither my body nor my soul will ever experience that, so I can't personally consider it to be a continuation of life after death.

No poll, really?

Atheist here.

wot

you can't be neutral-side

you have to be neutral-neutral for it to be neutral
There can actually be four main alignments:
Agnostic Atheist --- Assumes there isn't a god, but isn't sure, needs proof.
Gnostic Atheist  --- Knows that there absolutly can not be a god, because of reasons.
Agnostic Theist  --- Assumes there is a god, though it hasn't been proven to him.
Gnostic Theist   --- Has an absolute belief in god, probably believes that he or she has personally seen/felt him.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2013, 08:13:42 AM by DrenDran »