Author Topic: Nienhaus linking child research on tinychat  (Read 89909 times)

What, people cannot be part of either side anymore?

Wait let me correct that;

If you're handicapped enough to defend furries: you are as worthless as a furry

there we go

what exactly is the problem with that? are you under the impression that only furries do it?
i dont recall roleplaying as a humanoid animal. i am assuming most furries would do that. maybe some children would, too? they don't really count because they're just having childhood fun.

Wait let me correct that;

If you're handicapped enough to defend furries: you are as worthless as a furry

there we go
i have to admit, you're being very cringable right now.
the fact that you have this avatar doesnt help you look alright

yeah definitely i'm completely worthless because i'm defending a furry who doesn't yiff or do anything that's actually bad

forget anything i actually do or accomplished!!

It's okay because a lot of other people do it too!
lol okay
i dont recall roleplaying as a humanoid animal. i am assuming most furries would do that. maybe some children would, too? they don't really count because they're just having childhood fun.
who cares if they do? it's not like there's no consent. it literally does not affect you at all and it doesn't affect anyone or anything in a negative way

What, people cannot be part of either side anymore?

You stupid loving piece of stuff. It's just mind-boggling how loving pretentious and unintelligent you are, and it's almost frustrating how willingly oblivious you are to your own stupidity. This entire thread you've done nothing but side-step logical arguments supported by actual doctors and solid, scientific data, and you've been doing nothing but strawmanning and high-fiving your stupid loving furry buddies over how fast you can talk yourself into circles while ignoring anything that you can't argue with.

The irrefutable facts of the matter is that there is hard science that proves that 1/5 of your "fandom" is willing to go on record and say that they forget animals. You are openly obsessed over the extremely specific and otherwise creepy special interest of a real, documented paraphilia yet you claim that you don't have the paraphilia. That's illogical. Deductive reasoning would lead any well-minded person to believe that you have a furry paraphilia on the basis of the completely otherwise-unwarranted obsession, and the science shows that there is a 1/5 chance that given the opportunity, you'd stick your richard in a dog.

What the forget is your argument against that?

lol okay

You people are one trick ponies, when you can't deny it, you're passive aggressive

You stupid loving piece of stuff. It's just mind-boggling how loving pretentious and unintelligent you are, and it's almost frustrating how willingly oblivious you are to your own stupidity.

!!!

lol okaywho cares if they do? it's not like there's no consent. it literally does not affect you at all and it doesn't affect anyone or anything in a negative way
except when they do it in public and basically announce it to everyone they can?
it's really annoying, do it in PMs or something

You people are one trick ponies, when you can't deny it, you're passive aggressive
if you have a problem with roleplaying you're gonna have a boring love life
except when they do it in public and basically announce it to everyone they can?
it's really annoying, do it in PMs or something
that's different? anything private done in public is bad. this particular example is not special


Damn child enthusiasts derailed this thread by using a decoy versions to throw off our hate.


Damn child enthusiasts derailed this thread by using a decoy versions to throw off our hate.

Both furries and child enthusiasts are almost equally worthy of hatred



Basically what vinny is saying is that loving dogs on two legs is completely different from loving dogs on two legs.