Nienhaus linking child research on tinychat

[Zanaran2]

Any good argument needs a clear thesis statement.

That "clear thesis statement" was literally nothing but a swear-laced essay about how much of a dog-loving, fursuit-wearing, furcon-attending furry I am.

stupid loving stuff. loving stupidity. stupid loving

forget richard

forget

[Ad Bot]

[Steve5451²]

Any good argument needs a clear thesis statement.

Well it's certainly one hell of a hook.

[Thompson2Electricboogaloo]

Basically what vinny is saying is that loving dogs on two legs is completely different from loving dogs on four legs.

[Fennis]

There is a difference between a child enthusiast and child rapist. child enthusiasts are people who are just attracted to children, and don't necessarily act on their desires, while child rapists actually act on those desires and go out and have love with kids. What exactly is so bad about a child enthusiast who hasn't committed the rape of a child or any loveual offense? They can't control their attraction, sort of the same way that you can't control whether you're gay/straight/bi/aloveual.

/devilsadvocate

[Zanaran2]

That "clear thesis statement" was literally nothing but a swear-laced essay about how much of a dog-loving, fursuit-wearing, furcon-attending furry I am.

NOEDIT: Go ahead and send another scathing reply about how loving worthless I am.

I'm sure we didn't need to read the same quote twice

[Stocking]

That "clear thesis statement" was literally nothing but a swear-laced essay about how much of a dog-loving, fursuit-wearing, furcon-attending furry I am.

Still desperately trying to cling to any excuse to ignore the evidence are we? I originally posted the data and argument 5 pages ago and you're still to even acknowledge it exists.

The irrefutable facts of the matter is that there is hard science that proves that 1/5 of your "fandom" is willing to go on record and say that they forget animals. You are openly obsessed over the extremely specific and otherwise creepy special interest of a real, documented paraphilia yet you claim that you don't have the paraphilia. That's illogical. Deductive reasoning would lead any well-minded person to believe that you have a furry paraphilia on the basis of the completely otherwise-unwarranted obsession, and the science shows that there is a 1/5 chance that given the opportunity, you'd stick your richard in a dog.

[Operator¹]

The Gerbasi study doesn't mention bestiality anywhere in it, and the most relevant question is basically asking furries if they would want to be 0% human if they got the chance.

And you know what's god-damn hilarious?

From your own source, I looked up two of the studies mentioned in the article.



These are comparisons, with green representing the later survey.

Even if you average the two, you end up with a measly 8%, while non-zoophiles would average out at roughly 90%.

[Night Fox]

there are more zoophiles than plushophiles?
honestly can say I didn't expect that

[Zanaran2]

Still desperately trying to cling to any excuse to ignore the evidence are we? I originally posted the data and argument 5 pages ago and you're still to even acknowledge it exists.

Except you're just posting evidence from surveys just to say that I'm a furry because I defended some guy in an argument.

[Thompson2Electricboogaloo]

I'm sure we didn't need to read the same quote twice

It's a sound argument

also:



Blackout or bust

[Stocking]

The Gerbasi study doesn't mention bestiality anywhere in it, and the most relevant question is basically asking furries if they would want to be 0% human if they got the chance.

And you know what's god-damn hilarious?

[ url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-excess/201309/animal-instincts]From your own source[/url], [u rl=http://www.cannedgeek.com/images/sharedfiles/fss_report_finaldraft.PDF]I looked up two of the studies[/url][u rl=http://www2.asanet.org/sectionanimals/articles/GerbasilFurries.pdf] mentioned in the article.[/url]



These are comparisons, with green representing the later survey.

Even if you average the two, you end up with a measly 8%, while non-zoophiles would average out at roughly 90%.

Except the second survey was an actual, in-person poll where the furries were asked IRL. Of course it would stand to reason that they would lie about it in person, and it's proven by the fact that in the Gerbasi study, which was an anonymous poll of furries, 17% were willing to admit to zoophilia.

He genius, zoophilia and bestiality are the same thing, one is just a greek word and one is germanic.

[BlueCacti]

what the flying forget is a plushophile.

[Stocking]

what the flying forget is a plushophile.

furries who prefer love with stuffed animals rather than humans.

[Zanaran2]

what the flying forget is a plushophile.

guy or girl who bones plushies
dont look it up

[Alyx Vance]

Except the second survey was an actual, in-person poll where the furries were asked IRL. Of course it would stand to reason that they would lie about it in person, and it's proven by the fact that in the Gerbasi study, which was an anonymous poll of furries, 17% were willing to admit to zoophilia.

He genius, zoophilia and bestiality are the same thing, one is just a greek word and one is germanic.

"Oh no, this goes against my argument! They are lying!"
Honestly now?