Output Event-Server Command

[Blocki]

That's nonsense. If it doesn't call it instantly, it completely defies the point.

[Ad Bot]

[General]

Hence the custom exception list and command filtering. There is no other way to release this without it being a security issue, so any possibility is worth considering.

Besides, a command like ban is more suited to have a prompt don't you think?

[Blocki]

Let's just put a rtb pref to make it host only

[TB2]

Wow, this topic turned into a huge discussion.

[Blocki]

Wow, this topic turned into a huge discussion.

Well, did you get your event?

[Who Cares99]

Let's just put a rtb pref to make it host only

Or not even have a pref. (Badspot's reason for failing this seemed to be hosts giving people access to it without realizing what it can do. I don't think a warning label would be effective enough so I think it should be host only regardless.)

[Badspot]

Even if it was host only it's still a tremendously bad idea because malicious scripts could be embedded in save files. 

[Blocki]

Even if it was host only it's still a tremendously bad idea because malicious scripts could be embedded in save files. 

When a brick is loaded, check whether the guy that loaded it has permission to add the event?

[General]

Could still be a problem when ownership isn't loaded

[Blocki]

That's why you check whether the guy uploading the save has permission?

[Greek2me]

What Badspot's saying is that I would be able to distribute a malicious save file to other people using this.

[Blocki]

"Warning! A brick has an event to call 'ban' with the arguments '0 <var:cl:bl_id> -1 hah'. Apply this event?"

"Yes" "No"

[Starzy]

"Warning! A brick has an event to call 'ban' with the arguments '0 <var:cl:bl_id> -1 hah'. Apply this event?"

"Yes" "No"

Eughh, you'd have to check every single brick if it has that event, and it'd have to be within a short time, if a guy loaded a 256k save file, it'd take so long to check every brick that the event would have already activated.