LGBTQA megathread- the stuffstorm has passed and a rainbow protrudes the clouds.

[childofdarkness016]

I'm aloveual-homoromantic, so I should naturally be added.

also did you define romantic attraction vs. loveual attraction because you don't know how many people don't understand that

[Ad Bot]

[Axo-Tak]

I am an omniloveual bigender.

I prefer if you call me by "they".

[Epicduke]

I am an omniloveual bigender.

I prefer if you call me by "they".

"they ate pizza"
I still don't understand how most people are supposed to tell that I meant one person instead of more than one

[Axo-Tak]

"they ate pizza"
I still don't understand how most people are supposed to tell that I meant one person instead of more than one

State who did it before using the pronoun, or the person could be implied.

P1: Where is P2?
P2: They ate pizza, silly.

[Otis Da HousKat]

I'd stick my crank shaft in the muffler any day

That's not even where that goes you sick forget.

[Alyx Vance]

That's not even where that goes you sick forget.

I just chose 2 random parts and threw it in there "I'd stick my X into (his/her) Y"

[childofdarkness016]

"they ate pizza"
I still don't understand how most people are supposed to tell that I meant one person instead of more than one

Well, there's no gender neutral pronoun that's A: singular and B: not "it" because it sounds dehumanizing. Unless something catches on (zher sounds really stupid to me, so i kind of hope it's not popular), people are going to use they both singularly and plurally.

[Epicduke]

Well, there's no gender neutral pronoun that's A: singular and B: not "it" because it sounds dehumanizing. Unless something catches on (zher sounds really stupid to me, so i kind of hope it's not popular), people are going to use they both singularly and plurally.

why does.it even sound dehumanizing.
i wouldn't mind being called it

[Nonnel]

the gay agenda is nothing compared to the lesbian gay biloveual trans queer aloveual panloveual sapioloveual omniloveual autoloveual interloveual demiloveual polyloveual pomoloveual androloveual gyneloveual agenda

[///]

Well, there's no gender neutral pronoun that's A: singular and B: not "it" because it sounds dehumanizing. Unless something catches on (zher sounds really stupid to me, so i kind of hope it's not popular), people are going to use they both singularly and plurally.

"they" is a singular, gender neutral pronoun. singular they exists

[BlueCacti]

OK stuff like this is really getting on my nerves.

Now, im not the type of starfish that says "GOD HATES cigaretteS!!111" and stuff like that because, to be honest, i don't care if someone is gay or not. i see no problem with having a certain loveual preference. but all of this LGBTWTFBBQ stuff isn't needed. it feels like everyone that is actually gay just started thinking to themselves "hey being gay is a normal thing in society now! I need to be special still!" "HEY EVERYONE IM NOT JUST GAY ANYMORE, IM A TRANSQUEER NON BINARY AloveUAL ANDROGYNOUS LESBIAN!" like seriously why does there have to be so many different loveual preferences? someone even posted a small list of them and two of the definintions were basically the same

Panloveual: a person attracted to personality regardless of love or gender.
Omniloveual: a person who does not have a loveual preference and may be attracted to everyone equally.

those are basically both the same thing. why do you need two different definitions of them?

and then there's people like:

Queer: a person who is not heteroloveual and wants to acknowledge it without conforming to a conventional loveuality.

and this basically means "im gay but there are too many gay people so in order to be unique and special i have to be a special kind of gay with a different name"

are you loving serious?

once again im just going to say i don't care if you're gay, i just don't understand why you have to feel so special about it?

go ahead and yell at me it doesn't matter, im just showing how unnecessary all of this is.

[Axo-Tak]

why does.it even sound dehumanizing.
i wouldn't mind being called it

"it" is normally used for animals or objects, except in some cases.

P1: Where is the lizard?
P2: It ran away.

[childofdarkness016]

why does.it even sound dehumanizing.
i wouldn't mind being called it

"It" is generally used for non-human things.

"I lost my pen. Where could it be?"

Some people don't mind being called it, but Axo-Tak clearly doesn't feel comfortable with "it," and therefore prefers they.

Also, you should probably mention somewhere that demiloveuality and gray-aloveuality are part of the aloveual spectrum because most people treat them like separate loveualities

[Mega-Bear]

-snip-

I'm pretty sure that's how literally everyone feels...

[OrkusBorkus]

I'm pretty sure that's how literally everyone feels...

not silreath though

he believes in 50 gender equality