Author Topic: Just when you thought people couldn't get any more sensitive...  (Read 8507 times)

OH stuff WRONG TOPIC

The problem is that the label isn't the bad thing.  Being the thing that the label refers to is what is bad.  Any word you pick is going to become an insult because no one wants to be mentally deficient.  "Moron", "idiot" and "imbecile" all started out as medical terms and degenerated into insults.   Then "handicapped" replaced them as the kind word to say and now that's wearing out.  "Autistic" is fast becoming a general insult.  There's no escape because the condition is the insult, not the label.  

If you want to remove the insult you have to address the condition - either cure it or make people sympathize and understand the afflicted.  Attacking words does nothing but encourage people to dismiss the issue.  


Just when I read this I'm reminded of the fact that names and insults are thrown around so frequently where I live that it has like, no effect on anybody. Does anyone else find this? Or is it exclusively irish :/

The more I look into this #BanBossy the more I cringe the stuff out of my ass. I'm just going to say this:

If you don't know the actual meaning of the word you're trying to ban or whatever, you should go right back to the drawing board and think up another petition, because your idea will never work even if there's a billion dollar company supporting you who are apparently just as illiterate.


Google should be legitimately disappointed in themselves.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 08:08:40 PM by Slammer1337 »

Was this the first time Badspot unbanned someone?

OT:
What a load of stuff. If you get called "bossy" so loving what?
I have actually never heard anyone get called that.

usually people just call their bosses starfish or cunt or something similar privately

EDIT: Also that "r-word" thing is dumb as stuff. Mental handicapation is an actual medical term.

That's not the point of the r-word thing. There would be controversy surrounding "handicap" if people used it in a medical setting. The point of the r-word campaign is to stop the derogatory use of it.

It's like the word gay. If a person is gay, then they're gay. The word doesn't become an issue until it is associated with something negative.

Although after what Badspot said, I understand the flaw in this sort of thinking. Negative denotations will always be assigned to different words.

-snip-

I agree fully. Being called bossy doesn't mean someone is taking on a leadership role, it means they suck at taking a leadership role. If someone is told they're bossy I think it should come as a learning experience--how do I avoid being bossy in the future? What caused me to seem bossy in the first place?

First and foremost, 'leadership' is not a thing in elementary schools.

Just playing devil's advocate here: a lot of elementary schools in Ohio take part in a program called the Leadership Summit. Students write essays explaining what they think makes someone a fit leader, and college students review the essays then choose the best of them. I was a part of the program (hehe what can I say), and my teachers ended up trying to give me more independence.

Not super leadership-focused, because again we're just elementary kids, but I guess they at least tried to nurture confidence in us.

The problem is that the label isn't the bad thing.  Being the thing that the label refers to is what is bad.  Any word you pick is going to become an insult because no one wants to be mentally deficient.  "Moron", "idiot" and "imbecile" all started out as medical terms and degenerated into insults.   Then "handicapped" replaced them as the kind word to say and now that's wearing out.  "Autistic" is fast becoming a general insult.  There's no escape because the condition is the insult, not the label. 

If you want to remove the insult you have to address the condition - either cure it or make people sympathize and understand the afflicted.  Attacking words does nothing but encourage people to dismiss the issue.

I see what you mean, and I especially like your last sentence because it can be observed right here. Attacking the word is doing nothing but making us think this whole movement is silly and ridiculous.

You're totally right, actually. I see that, no matter what new words we invent, people will always begin to use them as an insult as per the euphemism treadmill. Fighting the derogatory use of the word is pointless. Sympathizing really does work--I can't remember the last time I used handicap as an insult because I sympathize with my cousin and the special needs kids at school (I volunteer to help them out sometimes).
« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 08:11:31 PM by Mega-Bear »

You've gotta be loving kidding me.
This is what happens to politically correct societies.

Just another thing that pisses me off -
A true leader always rises to the top, and strives, no matter the obstacle. If the word "bossy" offends them, then they are not a true leader.

Just another thing that pisses me off -
A true leader always rises to the top, and strives, no matter the obstacle. If the word "bossy" offends them, then they are not a true leader.
This.


What the forget is this stuff?

This is what happens to politically correct societies.

Instead of making cheap shots you could always, you know, try to discuss this with everyone else. It's like every time a political thread comes up you just sit in the corner making narcissistic comments and dismissing everyone else's hot button issues as nothing compared to the Patriot Act or the NSA.

Most men aren't called leaders when they show this sort of dominance in the workplace or any place at all. The correct term for male "bossyness" is just called being an starfish.

I also think something shouldn't be classified as an insult unless it has to do with gender, race, or mental deformities. Calling someone a name like "stuffrichard" or "forget face" shouldn't even be insults. If you can't handle being called words like that you're just overly - sensitive.

-snip-
What the forget is this stuff?

They can't even keep to their one main goal?

Heroes outnumber heroin as they're trying to abolish drugs :cookieMonster:

Oh look this stupid crap is being endorsed by none other than Girl Scouts!

No surprise there. Every experience that I've had with a Girl Scout has shown me that the organization is nothing more than a corrupt bunch of left-wing female politicians who want to raise a generation of misandrious girls that have no respect for men.

Oh look this stupid crap is being endorsed by none other than Girl Scouts!

No surprise there. Every experience that I've had with a Girl Scout has shown me that the organization is nothing more than a corrupt bunch of left-wing female politicians who want to raise a generation of misandrious girls.
Oh, and google.