The Lego Movie VS. Frozen

[DrenDran]

i havent seen frozen because i am a straight white male

Yeah, there were so many blacks waiting in line to see it. I couldn't even get a ticket.

[Ad Bot]

[otto-san]

frozen looks really stupid if you haven't seen it but it's rly gud

[Swat 3]

Apparently one frame in Frozen took 150 hours (around that time I guess) to render.

[devildogelite]

Frozen has poor animation? Oh wait it's lord tony so this makes a lot of sense now. They designed a whole engine to deal with snow for Frozen. It has some really good animation. I mean the Lego movie looks awesome too but Frozen doesn't look bad at all.

[DrenDran]

Apparently one frame in Frozen took 150 hours (around that time I guess) to render.

That seems a bit high.
It's running time was 102 minutes, or 6120 seconds.
IDK what the framerate but 60 seems like a decent guess, as it's the refresh rate of most monitors and max fps of games that limit fps.
That's 367,200 frames.
That's 55,080,000 hours.
Or 6287 years.

Even if they had 6287 computers running simultaneously that'd still take a whole year to render.

[otto-san]

Oh wait it's lord tony so this makes a lot of sense now.

i just realised it's tony and this topic is now hilarious

[WALDO]

That seems a bit high.
It's running time was 102 minutes, or 6120 seconds.
IDK what the framerate but 60 seems like a decent guess, as it's the refresh rate of most monitors and max fps of games that limit fps.
That's 367,200 frames.
That's 55,080,000 hours.
Or 6287 years.

Even if they had 6287 computers running simultaneously that'd still take a whole year to render.

Actually you have the wrong picture. Each frame doesn't take the same amount of time to render, it depends on how complex the scene is. And about the frame rate, movies are usually 24 frames per second. It's rare that a movie is 30 frames or 60 frames per second.

[lolz??]

That seems a bit high.
It's running time was 102 minutes, or 6120 seconds.
IDK what the framerate but 60 seems like a decent guess, as it's the refresh rate of most monitors and max fps of games that limit fps.
That's 367,200 frames.
That's 55,080,000 hours.
Or 6287 years.

Even if they had 6287 computers running simultaneously that'd still take a whole year to render.

they probably have larger render farms than that, im guessing they have about 10000 cores but that's just an estimate.
also many of the scenes vary in complexity so render times could change, judging by how quickly the movie was made, that statistic is probably token from the most complex scene to render in the movie

movies are usually 24 frames per second

take a look by clicking on the pics:


both of them are really quite amazing graphics wise, while lego movie imitates what it would actually look like if filmed better, in the end i'd say more time was put into frozen

[DrenDran]

Actually you have the wrong picture. Each frame doesn't take the same amount of time to render, it depends on how complex the scene is. And about the frame rate, movies are usually 24 frames per second. It's rare that a movie is 30 frames or 60 frames per second.

Ah.


Is it just me or is it weird that Frozen sold out almost three times as much (Frozen had just over a billion in sales, Lego movie had less than 400 million) yet here the poll shows the lego movie leading in a land slide?

[lolz??]

Ah.


Is it just me or is it weird that Frozen sold out almost three times as much (Frozen had just over a billion in sales, Lego movie had less than 400 million) yet here the poll shows the lego movie leading in a land slide?

well this is pretty much a forum about legos

[nickpb1]

Is it just me or is it weird that Frozen sold out almost three times as much (Frozen had just over a billion in sales, Lego movie had less than 400 million) yet here the poll shows the lego movie leading in a land slide?

Remember that disney movies always have a tendency to be huge hits throughout the world. A staggering amount of frozen's ticket sales are in foreign (Outside US) country's. Which I find strange seeing how Lego is not even a US company.   

[otto-san]

Remember that disney movies always have a tendency to be huge hits throughout the world. A staggering amount of frozen's ticket sales are in foreign (Outside US) country's. Which I find strange seeing how Lego is not even a US company.   

i get the idea that a lot of the lego movie's references and jokes were based on US pop culture and whatnot

[Epicduke]

i haven't seen either but i would pick the lego movie over frozen

[GhostStar]

they probably have larger render farms than that, im guessing they have about 10000 cores but that's just an estimate.
also many of the scenes vary in complexity so render times could change, judging by how quickly the movie was made, that statistic is probably token from the most complex scene to render in the movietake a look by clicking on the pics:


both of them are really quite amazing graphics wise, while lego movie imitates what it would actually look like if filmed better, in the end i'd say more time was put into frozen

yup this. i mean really, correct me if im wrong, but all the lego movie had to do was find one texture that would work for a realistic plastic... and bam, they have literally finished texuring the entire movie, now all they had to do was recolor that one texture. but with frozen, they had to create a new texture for EVERYTHING. that's a stuff load of textures. and its like that with a lot of CGi films. im not much of an animator. i mainly just make 3d models. and im telling you now. the lego movie, was prolly the easiest loving movie to model. other than veggie tales. stuff they already had all the brick models from lego digital designer. it wouldnt suprise me if all they did was move all the brick models from LDD and stuck them in the film

[lolz??]

yup this. i mean really, correct me if im wrong, but all the lego movie had to do was find one texture that would work for a realistic plastic... and bam, they have literally finished texuring the entire movie, now all they had to do was recolor that one texture. but with frozen, they had to create a new texture for EVERYTHING. that's a stuff load of textures. and its like that with a lot of CGi films. im not much of an animator. i mainly just make 3d models. and im telling you now. the lego movie, was prolly the easiest loving movie to model. other than veggie tales. stuff they already had all the brick models from lego digital designer. it wouldnt suprise me if all they did was move all the brick models from LDD and stuck them in the film

i saw footage of them using a program to virtually build buildings with legos for the movie, while the rendering work was impressive, it's not impossible that the models themselves (besides oddball ones like the pirate guy) were generated entirely by people building them inside a program